User talk:Herald63

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ukrainian Heraldry Society, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://uht.org.ua/en/about/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

Hi! I'am an author of the website http:uht.org.ua . So, I hold the copyright to this text and permit its use under the terms consistent with Wikipedia's policies. Herald63 (talk) 20:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given your high fluency in Polish, I am reaching out to you in regards to the

Thank you! Pola.mola (talk) 20:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Much of this is unreferenced. All of it must be referenced.

In particular, which

reliable sources

say such things as that he "rushed like a fresh whirlwind into Ukrainian art"? Provide references.

This "Russian and Soviet artists from 1900 to 1980; catalog. London, 1989" -- what is it, exactly? (ISBN? OCLC?) And how is it significant that he's merely "listed" within it? (If on the other hand his works are discussed within it, then summarize the discussion.)

The long list of "Some works" is uninformative and useless. Either cut the entire list, or reduce the number of items to ten or fewer, retitle the result as "Notable works", and for each work briefly explain the notability, of course with references.

"he left a significant artistic heritage": if this means "many paintings", then say so; if it doesn't, then say what it means.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stepan Nechai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stepan Nechai, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 21:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Herald63! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 21:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Herald63. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]