User talk:Hoaeter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

October 2018

Abyssinian people. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:13, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Abyssinian people. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Turtlewong (talk) 02:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Oromo people. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Turtlewong (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tigre people. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Turtlewong (talk) 02:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

——SerialNumber54129 14:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Long-term issues at Habesha peoples. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock and Confession

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoaeter (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Northeast African

) 1:51 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Rosguill:

What do you mean by linkspam? Are you talink about the sources that I cite? Do I cite sources too much, do we all cite sources too much too? Hoaeter (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probbably the reason for the block were the mass aditions of Habesha Union [ሐበሻ] . “What Do You Mean by Habesha? — A Look at the Habesha Identity (P.s./t: It’s Very Vague, Confusing, & Misunderstood) | @habesha_union.” Academia, 1 Oct. 2018. under Fruther Reading in ~30 articles in October 2020. Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was a valid sources and read more section, for these various Wikipedia articles because the topics are all interconnected. Hoaeter (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC) @Gyrofrog: @Doug Weller: @Drmies: @Austronesier: @Only:[reply]

It's a blog post, not a
WP:OWH infringements made along the way via various sockpuppets. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 11:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
]