User talk:Hocmyfitegre

Hello, Hocmyfitegre, and

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cahk (talk) 08:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Advice coming within an hour. JohnCD (talk) 09:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. I am afraid you are finding that writing an acceptable article is more difficult than you expected. I suggest you use WP:Articles for creation to guide you through the process. Some advice:

• Read
  WP:Your first article
  .
• References are vital. Wikipedia is quite selective about article subjects. The test for inclusion is called
  WP:AUTHOR
  for more about this.
• Wikipedia is extremely resistant to being used to sell anything. You can link to his website, but don't use promotional language like "his fantastic series", or seem to be inviting the reader to buy, "over 100 Travel guides to choose from" or "please stop by... " Wikipedia is an
  encyclopedia
  and the tone should reflect that.
• If you are Andrew Delaplaine, or employed by him, read WP:Autobiography and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hocmyfitegre, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Hocmyfitegre/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First, please do not create multiple copies of drafts. This confuses the reviewers. Second, I for one will not review a a sandbox draft without moving it to draft space, which I can't, because you have another draft in draft space. This is better than the one in draft space. I suggest that you request speedy deletion of the draft in draft space as user-requested, and then this draft can be moved into draft space and reviewed. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andrew Delaplaine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. The NYT ref is a dead link. IMDb alone is not enough to support a BLP article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 10:59, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Andrew Delaplaine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability - one festival nomination isn't enough

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 11:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Delaplaine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Delaplaine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 14:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Andrew Delaplaine. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Joe Roe (talk) 20:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hocmyfitegre! I'm Joe Roe. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Joe Roe (talk) 21:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hocmyfitegre. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]