User talk:ILBobby

Archives

User:Canadian Bobby/Archive 1

Welcome!

need to telling you some stuff

) 19:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC) MSN ;) ]

MSN ja?

]

BTW i archived your talk page > > > > >
Hope you dont mind ;)

]

Gordon Brown

Gordo goes to the doctors and says "every time i look in the mirror i get aroused". The doctor replied "Im not suprised, your a c*nt" lol. Chat?

]

Yo! Bobby, chit chat? msn yeh. Let me know when your online, then i'll come on msn ;)

talk) 15:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Where are you?

talk) 19:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. In light of the fact that it is the first book the U.S. government ever went to court to censor before its publication(!), I was hoping you could help improve the The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence article as part of an effort to make it worthy of becoming a featured article candidate? --Loremaster (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Russavia is currently removing the "Category:Diplomatic Missions by country" tag from these articles. His reason relates to putting articles in categories and sub-categories - you may read it on his

. I do not share his view, nor do I think it was prudent for him to make the changes without consulting first. Please make your judgement on this matter and advise him on his ]

Notwithstanding protests by others, and without providing a reason that we can be satisfied with, Russavia has continued to implement his changes that degrade the Diplomatic Missions by Country the articles. Most recently he has added a list of ambassadors to

Diplomatic missions of Russia

.

I have written to him a sterner note on his talk page, stating that the Diplomatic missions by country tag belong to articles, not to category pages. Unless a consensus emerges it will remain this way.

I would appreciate if you remain seized of this issue for the time being. Kransky (talk) 10:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As per advice on

]

MSN

You online mate?

]

talk?

talk) 17:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

im online mate, but let me know when to come on to msn yeh? ;)

talk) 10:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Im comming on msn now

talk) 14:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

you online?

talk) 16:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Shall i come on msn?

talk) 18:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

MSN ja?

talk) 11:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello

Let's chat sometimes on MSN Ari d'Kosova (talk) 03:54, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Egypt was ace. Let me know when your online mate

]

Hia

So i go to Amsterdam for 5 days. Come back home and i find out the world has gone chaotic, war with Georgia and Russia, coup in Mauritania, UK economy shit ect. At least recognition for Kosovo and Olympics is cool

]

In 5 min mate, you stupid bastard!

talk) 18:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I got in man. Well good. Brap! Msn?

]

Malaysian Liaison Office denies freezing the recognition procedure. (in Albanian) English version].

talk) 15:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

check this out

talk) 22:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

[1] chat?

talk) 08:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Czech Rep

Im back. Msn?

]

I'll be on msn in 10-15 min. Be there lol

talk) 18:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Kosovo is lobbying

[2] Speaker of Parliament of the Republic of Kosovo, Jakup Krasniqi met with many foreign ambassadors in a visit to the US. Apparently the "Haitian government is in the process of recognition of Kosovo independence.". HAHAH! go on. Also i saw your thing on the site ;) Let me know when your online mate

]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

]

Message me

...as soon as you come online please. Then we can talk on msn ;)

]

Nicaragua recognised ABSO btw

talk) 18:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll be on msn in 2 min

talk) 18:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC):[reply

]

MSN mate?

talk) 16:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Let me know when you've logged in please ;)

talk) 18:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

LOL!

talk) 12:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

MSN?

talk) 17:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Apparently Russian citizens are becoming more pro Kosovo [3] MSN?

talk) 15:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Im in Wales now. Uni is ace. Sooooo good. Let me know if your to go on msn. Laters

talk) 10:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Yo msn?

talk) 11:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

[4] MSN mate?

talk) 11:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

seems ive missed you mate, i should be online tomorrow afternoon my time. Regards

talk) 22:50, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Re: Nielsen

Oh, I completely agree with you, Nielsen is trying to keep information from the Wikipedian public....but, so it didn't look like I was getting to

• October 11, 2008 @ 13:23

Perfect! Gets the point we all are trying to make across without making anyone upset. I like it :) Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk • October 11, 2008 @ 17:13

See, that's where the problem lies. All the legal department won't tell us even the very short version of what the OTRS ticket (the thing that caused the whole deletions to begin with) says. Some privacy thing. So, we are kinda left in the dark, I think intentionally, to rebuild everything. Alot of people are using regional information, like for "Washington DC" they are calling it "the greater Washington DC area", for "Johnstown/Altoona" it's "Central Pennsylvania and Happy Valley" and as people make templates with previous information, people are coming by and kinda "regionalizing" them.

So....I would wait until the templates are finished (which might take a couple) then rebuild the list with that information and not anything from Nielsen. Right now, most people are not having anything to do with Nielsen information. Please feel free to message back :) Take Care and Have a Great Sunday...NeutralHomer • Talk • October 12, 2008 @ 19:53

When are you going to be online next mate?

]

your not online now? :(

talk) 22:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

get online dude

talk) 14:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Missions in Taipei

A contributor has suggested that diplomatic missions in Taipei belonging to sending states that do not recognise the Republic of China should not be listed with a flag of the Republic of China, should be referred to as "Taiwan" and should contain a caveat specifying sending state does not recognise the Republic of China. While he has made this change to

Diplomatic missions of Ireland

, it would be appropriate that whatever decision to made to this article also is made in all the other DMBC articles (both the receiving and sending articles).

• I am against removing Taiwan's flag to the exclusion of others.
• I am against including caveats about the status of diplomatic relations, as this is not central to articles about diplomatic missions
• I am against a change to the self-identification principle, in which receiving states are listed according to their own name. I however acknowledge there is inconsistency in the application of this rule and would reconsider my position if there is strong support to apply the logical alternative (receiving states are named according to how sending states know them). This decision however is fiddlier and would put us in direct conflict with Taiwanese (and Macedonians) who would have other agendas.

In short it is not worth the extra work, and I am not certain that this new contributor is prepared for all the extra work (and edit wars) his change entails. Please provide your views in

Talk:Diplomatic missions of Ireland

MSN

Are you online mate? Regards

]

Embassy of Iceland in Nicaragua

Hi, just letting you know that there is an embassy of Iceland in Managua, Nicaragua. You can find the information here: Embassy in Nicaragua Aquintero (talk) 17:11, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a list of all embassies in Managua on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua. list Aquintero (talk) 20:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bobby, I've received an reply from the Solomon Islands Director of Immigration confirming that they have recognised the independence of Kosovo, and its passports. See here. (I'm feeling rather proud with myself!) Have you received a reply to your email also? Now all we need to do is convince people that this isn't OR... I've forwarded the mail to Kosovothanksyou - perhaps they will manage to get hold of something more official. Cheers Bazonka (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help me with something similiar?Max Mux (talk) 11:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has been about six months since Russavia's proposed new bold format was developed, using a table, smaller pictures, names of heads of missions and cross accreditations. We did not come to any consensus about using it - but it was a good opportunity to see how it would look. May I also add we were worn down by Russavia's persistence that his design stay, that we redo the taxonomy of the DMBC articles ("by sending state", "by receiving state"), and we allow all those articles of Russian missions (and missions to Russia) to exist, even if they just consist of the name of the ambassador and its address.

I am still not convinced that the design of Russavia's format is an improvement on the existing design, or that these articles are the right place to list heads of missions or accreditations. I have not seen any significant endorsement of his new format, nor anybody stating they wanted to make wholesale changes to all articles.

Please note what the Arbitration Committee states about MoS conflicts:

The Arbitration Committee has ruled that the Manual of Style is not binding, that editors should not change an article from one guideline-defined style to another without a substantial reason unrelated to mere choice of style, and that revert-warring over optional styles is unacceptable.

Where there is disagreement over which style to use in an article, defer to the style used by the first major contributor.

As the first major contributor of this article I intend now to revert the article back to its original style, including any subsequent updates.

Please add your views in the talk page of

.

Kransky (talk) 03:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I really would mate but I've got an essay due in on Fri morn on the

]

Come on msn please

talk) 19:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

[5]

talk) 09:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

MSN mate?

talk) 12:53, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Come on msn mate

talk) 16:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Kosovo

I haven't posted anything that is not important!Max Mux (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Create a Rep of Kosova/o page. Kosova is a state with a disputed sovereignty...not a disputed territory aka disputed land. I need your help to create ROK since there is none. PS, I hate dab, dab suck hah lol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.61.194 (talk) 00:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did not pop up out of nowhere. I made edits to a Cypriot section of an article, as I have done many times before. In response my edits were reverted first without explanation and then with an insult. You should maybe try looking at a situation before insulting people. Vizjim (talk) 09:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hahaha that was funny! :) Btw, I'm from Chicago but I'm currently overseas on a job assignment. --alchaemia (talk) 23:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby, could you please go here [[6]] and make your opinion known? They want to lump Kosovo under Serbia and they (Avala and Hexagon) are claiming that they have "consensus" even though it's only two of them talking about it. Thanks. --alchaemia (talk) 12:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to seek your view as to whether we should eliminate from the lists of diplomatic missions by sending/receiving countries all references to representative offices of sending states that do not have formal diplomatic missions with the host states. This would affect a large number of articles which relate to Taiwan, Palestine, Kosovo and other states. Please provide your views here. Thank you. Kransky (talk) 06:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you are active on Foreign relations of Montenegro article, could you say what do you think of my suggestion, I wrote it on talk page. Best regards! Rave92^(talk) 19:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

]

Diplomatic missions of the European Union

User:Alinor An editor with a keen interest in the EU has proposed to modify the article to list all the countries that do not have a mission of an EU member state, or only have one such mission. I do not support this edit, as the information does not concern diplomatic missions of the EU, only the missions of its member staets.

We have discussed this issue extensively in

. I think what Alinor is arguing is that the embassy of an EU member can represent the EU as a whole, or provide services to other EU members. I do not believe this is the case. And even if such arrangements exist, it would be outside the scope of the article.

If you feel inclined, please join the discussions, make your own mind up and share your views. Kransky (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, how are you? Thanks for updating the information about the states that recognized Montenegro even though it's not that much importing :) since it is not a problem, only diplomatic service need to inform states that MNE is independent :). Anyway what I wanted to ask you is that by the information I got, states that recognized Montenegro is 120, not 113. This is the information, which were presented officially by Montenegrin Government: http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/main/news/27446/

Could you please update the box. Thanks again!

Best regards.

Rave92^(talk) 15:32, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. User:Calmer Waters (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC) Calmer Waters 19:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,

]

Kosovo page

I don't know if it is vandalism as I don't remember that user being a regular editor, however it is hasty and should be reverted. At this point it is safe to doubt the news article as whomever spoke with journalists could have lied to them. Could you please contact diplomats of those two countries. Thanks.--Avala (talk) 23:37, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's not about Kosovo but about what Oman and Guinea-Bissau say. Do you maybe have some contacts in their embassies who could follow the story?--Avala (talk) 00:09, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is regarding "International recognition of Kosovo" and article size. It is not a POV proposal, just a purely technical matter regarding the KB size of the article which is currently too big. Please see my proposal here and give your views and opinions. Regards IJA (talk) 14:23, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canadian Bobby, one new contributor would like the DMBC articles to list as diplomatic missions the representatives of Polisario, an organisation advocating for the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, within the Sahrawi DMBC article. I have no problems with genuine missions of the SADR being listed, but I think most of the representatives listed cannot be considered diplomatic missions under the loosest of definitions (such as the 19 in Spain). Do you think we should list as diplomatic missions the representatives of political organisations? Or do you think this would be a radical departure from the definitions we have been using? Feel free to investigate his side of the story at Talk:List of diplomatic missions of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. Kransky (talk) Kransky (talk) 16:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You participated in a related discussion before. The current one is here. Japinderum (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you mentioned about the Republic of China in

]

New examples at Articles for deletion/List of DirecTV channels

I've added a perhaps more pertinent type of article in your "List of songs in Guitar Hero" discussion with @Masem. --Chaswmsday (talk) 15:57, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Chaswmsday (talk) 16:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@ kosovo-hater Canadian Bobby. Stop vandalizing what you don't like. 79.243.217.53 (talk) 13:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Bob defence 3.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

His "instruction" does not supersede The Constitution Statute of Illinois. The Same-sex marriage ban was struck down in Cook County and Cook County only. --Prcc27 (talk) 00:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To follow up, Quinn didn't tell them what to do exactly. He said the state would now register marriages once they were solemnized. And Madigan just gave muddled guidance. Last I counted, it looks like 7 of 102 counties are issuing licenses. For the best coverage, don't look to a WP entry like

talk) 20:49, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of diplomatic missions of Switzerland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muscat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks as if STP does not recognise right now. Would you like to add anything to Talk:International recognition of Kosovo before any changes are made? --Oranges Juicy (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Comet affiliates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KPLR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did notice that the Dutch MFA website directs you to their embassy in Rwanda, however, the website of the embassy in Burundi [7]was recently updated (16 February 2016) which indicates to me that they are still operating an embassy there. Cheers. Aquintero82, (talk), 21 February 2016, 19:51 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of diplomatic missions of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Plata. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Due to previous participation in a discussion on the subject, you are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Abkhazia#RfC on Infobox. CMD (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See

]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

The file File:Bob defence 3.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal image of largely-inactive editor.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message