User talk:Ideogram

I try to keep conversations threaded. I generally reply to posts here on this page. Usually if I post on your talk page I watchlist you.

Welcome!

Hello, Ideogram, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Hello Ideogram, Welcome to Wikipedia.
Thank you for the very kind message you left for me. It came as a very pleasant and welcome surprise. I think Wikipedia has a lot of potential, although it has its detractors, but I'm glad you've decided to make up your own mind about it and the best way to do that is to get involved. In the long run things usually work out well, and there are lot of very capable and dedicated editors here that ensure the integrity of the project is protected as much as possible. (The abilities of the various monkeys here are diverse but the mix seems to work.) Please let me know if there's anything you ever need help with and I look forward to hearing from you. Once again, welcome! Rossrs 00:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

to 17 Jun 2006 | to 21 Jun 2006 | to 26 Jun 2006 | to 07 Sep 2006 | to 17 Nov 2006 | to 07 Feb 2007 | to 08 Mar 2007 | to 23 Apr 2007 | to 10 Jun 2007 | to 8 Aug 2007 | to 16 Jul 2011

Hi Ideogram,

You classified a number of articles as "top-importance". A few months ago I went through Category:Top-importance Computer science articles and made sure all the articles in there where truly of top importance. Although there undoubtedly still a few articles missing, I don't think this category should exceed 100 articles. Could you double check to see if the articles you added (such as Compile time) are really as important as Alan Turing or the ubiquitous quicksort, as opposed to simply of high importance (which in turn probably shouldn't exceed a 1000 articles). Cheers, —Ruud 17:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK Ideogram (talk) 20:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I think there needs to be mediation on the Birthright Israel page. There seem to be several issues but the most important can be found on talk page under controversy. I invite you to take the opportunity to read through what has been said, and would really appreciate you weighing in. As I am on the newer side, I wanted some mediation for responding to those who seem to want to keep the article, what I would call, biased. Yaakov Birthright Franklin (talk) 01:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Forth (programming language) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]