User talk:Ihy34

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

comment added 02:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message:
  talk) 20:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ridernyc (talk) 00:24, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Plus, I have reverted your edits at
  Manual of Style, including putting wikilinks in quotes, overlinking, etc. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • They came from noisecreep, blabbermouth and other newsites. those are reliable. Ihy34 (talk) 03:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • No, they are metal fansites, and there are other problems as well, as I noted. If you can't improve an article, and you can't tell a reliable from an unreliable source (see
      WP:RS), then maybe you should leave at least the good articles alone. Drmies (talk) 14:07, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
      ]

I've reverted your edits to the WP:Genre warrior redirect because (1) we don't need 2 copies of the essay, (2) you can't just copy things without crediting the author, and (3) you can't just make it a policy by putting a category on it. 28bytes (talk) 02:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dot Dot Curve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to OMFG, Booch, Kronik, Jump!, The Bomb, I'm Still Here and Converse

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ihy34. You have new messages at Talk:Korn.
Message added 14:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Reviews at teethofthedivine.com reliable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You indicated that "those sources on christian go to the main page" which I do not understand. The first linked is AllMusic and it resolves to http://www.allmusic.com/artist/for-today-mn0000954009. The second is JFH: http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/cdreviews/Portraits.asp and it doesn't resolve to the main page. Not sure what you're on about. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Documentation for Template:Infobox album indicates that

" Drop words like "Records" from the end of the label's name (e.g. use [[Universal Records|Universal]] rather than [[Universal Records]])."

See

Template:Infobox_Album#Label specifially. That would mean we should list [[Facedown Records|Facedown]] rather than [[Facedown Records]] Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Since "Christian" is a proper noun, and genres that start with the word, such as Christian metal or Christian metalcore, are also capitalized. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:31, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

You are receiving a lot of warning messages. Please make sure you are representing the source faithfully.Curb Chain (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have a hard time understanding WP:reliable sources. I am going to ask you not to put sources to statements that cannot be found in the source.Curb Chain (talk) 00:58, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the edit summary. I should have said "note".Curb Chain (talk) 00:58, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of screamo bands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silverstein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in

Thanks for creating the article about the Korn single. I moved it to Faget (song), as the word Faget itself should be a disambiguation. Let me know if you have any questions. Jokestress (talk) 02:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Otep (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Babes in Toyland and L7

Need To (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mastering

Shoots and Ladders (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Mastering

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ihy34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't even know what I did wrong, I never abused my account. I k now i had various accounts as i made this one, but they were BACK-UPS in case my other accounts were hacked/etc. The only time sockpuppetry is on various accounts is when it's used to avoid blocks. During my 24 hour block i didn't ever use my back up accounts. I just waited for the block to expire. But suddenly this comes up. Wikipedia has said multiple accounts are okay, as long as you don't use them for sockpuppetry aka avoiding blocks. The admin "Elockid" didn't give a precise reason on why he blocked me. Ihy34 (talk) 02:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per Elockid's further explanation. Also, dirty sock masters don't really deserve further explanations. Syrthiss (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, it's also sockpuppetry if you're attempting to create a false consensus (i.e. your sockpuppets are all !voting on the same issue) or you're attempting to conceal who's actually making edits. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:40, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please disclose all your "backup" accounts. Max Semenik (talk) 07:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CU comment: Helping you guys out. If we ignore the fact that this account is a sock of a blocked sockmaster, 16 backup accounts is something I would call excessive. Note that you've edited from these backup accounts. Elockid ^(Talk) 12:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

The article

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see