User talk:Irishzambrano

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gianni Caprioli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gianni Caprioli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 09:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Irishzambrano! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 09:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Gusfriend it's my first time making a wiki page so im totally confused about it all. How can I make it better? Irishzambrano (talk) 09:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The best place is to visit the WP:Teahouse and ask your questions there but the short answer is that the text needs to be in a neutral tone without external links in the body of the article and not so many external links in the "See also" section. Also, the "Further reading" section makes it seem like a review site. A more neutral presentation of that information would be something like "Restaurants associated with Caprioli have received positive reviews and awards (a couple of refs)". Gusfriend (talk) 10:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.Thank you. I understand and will redo those. Can the wiki page be resubmitted until approved? Irishzambrano (talk) 10:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong Hi! I am not paid for this job and is simply doing the job i was asked which was to make a wikipedia for my boss. Hope this answer your question Irishzambrano (talk) 11:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That means that Wikipedia considers you to be a paid editor. Theroadislong (talk) 11:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Irishzambrano. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Irishzambrano. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Irishzambrano|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Irishzambrano, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Irishzambrano|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 11:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong

So do I just add this on the top of the userpage I am doing {{unpaid|employer=Caprioli Management}}? Im very confused. Sorry for my questions Irishzambrano (talk) 11:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No you are deemed to be a paid editor so you need to use the form {{paid|user=Irishzambrano|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}} Theroadislong (talk) 11:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheroadislongHi i Just used that in a Userpage. So, when editing the biography again do I open the previous one and paste in the same userpage or just go back to that contribution? Irishzambrano (talk) 03:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your question sorry. Youhave now dosclosed your paid editing status so you can continue editing the draft Draft:Gianni Caprioli. Theroadislong (talk) 07:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Early life section is totally unsourced and the lede section is not about him? Content like "catering a banquets for the most prominent, demanding and powerful leaders of the world and industries." is not neutral tone and has no place here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gianni Caprioli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gianni Caprioli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission does not appear to be written in

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gianni Caprioli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gianni Caprioli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 15:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Irishzambrano! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help with biography, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply ]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission does not appear to be written in

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gianni Caprioli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 07:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Irishzambrano. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]