User talk:IsaacMHair

Hi, would you refer me to the particular edit? I would like to find a source explicitly supporting the statement, or if I cannot find one, delete the statement. Thank you! IsaacMHair (talk) 03:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Flemmish Nietzsche. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Peer review have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 01:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment!

I was editing the source for Scholarly peer review to move some information from the "introduction" section to the "criticism" section (which was listed as and edit suggestio). However, a section in Peer review links to the introduction from Scholarly peer review. I was restoring the contents of the section in Peer review so that it contains all of the information that it did previously. IsaacMHair (talk) 01:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave the contents as they appear with your most recent edit. IsaacMHair (talk) 01:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with that is the peer review article uses the {{excerpt}} template, which simply transcludes the lead of another article, in this case scholarly peer review. You do not need to copy to the peer review article any changes made to the lead of the scholarly peer review article. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 01:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]