User talk:Itrytohelp32
This is Itrytohelp32's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 16)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Itrytohelp32/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Itrytohelp32!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CptViraj (📧) 10:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
|
Red links
Hello and thank you for your edits. Wikipedia certainly has a lot of red links to articles which should never be written, and it can be helpful to unlink them. In case you've not seen it,
@
List of cities with the most skyscrapers - undone edits
I noticed that you removed Metro Vancouver and Paris Courbevoie from List of cities with the most skyscrapers because they are not cities proper. Unfortunately, Metro Manila is not a city proper either, yet it has been on the page for a long time and still is. I would like to inquire if you will be removing that as well for consistency? On an aside, two out of two people on the talk page agreed that metropolitan areas should be included. Zacharycmango (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Zacharycmango Yes, you absolutely raise a good point. It is my opinion that Manila should be removed for consistency, but a discussion about it is certainly worth having- considering multiple editors think that they should be included. I suggest we open a proper discussion about it on the talk page. I've reverted my two edits until a consensus can be reached. Itrytohelp32 (talk) 01:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Adding your own images to articles and consideration of quality
Thanks for adding images to Wikipedia articles! It looks like some of the replacements you've done added your image when it was clearly not higher quality. This seemed especially true at
- @— Rhododendrites talk The Central Park Tower image you mentioned isn't current. Also, please assume good faith- I'm not trying to upload photos to leads just because they're mine. I simply have newer images and am trying to add newer images. Also, I never reverted anyone's changes. I was changing the image every time to try to put forth the best one possible. I don't appreciate you assuming that my edits are in bad faith. Also, about your not threat. I never restored the same image. Just trying to add a better one. I'm trying to make Wikipedia a better place. Good Day Itrytohelp32 (talk) 03:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough. It just seems hard to understand what benefit this image has over this one. But perhaps I just don't see it or understand, in which case sorry for coming to the conclusion it was motivated by it being your own. Let me reframe my unsolicited advice, then: when other people might not understand or might disagree with your choice of image, it helps to explain why (beyond it being newer, usually speaking to angles, amount of subject shown, quality of the image, etc.) on the talk page. FWIW. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- @— Rhododendrites talk I agree with the idea that your image is a better image aesthetically. However, it is my subjective opinion- that being a large construction project currently changing everyday- the date the image was taken should be considered to be more relevant- as it should more accurately represents the subject of the photo as long as it isn't completely appalling. However, if you believe that my image is too poor of a quality to be considered- then by all means, revert it to your revision. Happy Editing Itrytohelp32 (talk) 03:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Fatemeh Karizi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
- @DMySon, Thank you for the movement to drafts rather that suggesting the article for deletion. It's been quite a while since I last edited and suppose I'm pretty darn rusty. Regardless, you handled my poorly-written article professionally and I appreciate your assistance. Happy Editing and Merry Christmas. Itrytohelp32 (talk) 19:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Fatemeh Karizi
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
Your draft article, Draft:Fatemeh Karizi
Hello, Itrytohelp32. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review