User talk:JKlug81

Blocked as a sockpuppet

illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

What the hell is this about? Who are these people you’re linking me to? I’m assuming there is some misunderstanding somewhere, but needs to be resolved immediately!

If someone has a problem with me, do the professional thing and reach out directly. Seems like a group of people are in a dispute over pointless crap, but don’t pull me into it! JKlug81 (talk) 20:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JKlug81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What the hell is this about? Who are these people you’re linking me to? I’m assuming there is some misunderstanding somewhere, but needs to be resolved immediately! If someone has a problem with me, do the professional thing and reach out directly. Seems like a group of people are in a dispute over pointless crap, but don’t pull me into it! JKlug81 (talk) 20:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 20:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JKlug81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey @Yamla, how about you provide some sort of information? This is absolute bullshit. I am not in anyway affiliated with the dispute between those people. If you folks have a problem with specific content, say so! But to block my account for not reason is just the biggest geek-like action ever. I'm sorry that I'm a fan of certain things and have knowledge, but if you have a beef with other users, deal with them. Don't rope me into it when I have nothing to do with it.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Entirely unambiguous. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JKlug81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m so sorry that you all feel this way. I’m not a spammer, have no clue who these other people are, and have never even received any kind of warning that something I was doing was wrong. I could understand if there was some sort of notice that I was doing something wrong, but this seems to be some sort of witch hunt.

Again, I am not affiliated with the account you linked me to, and would appreciate you unlocking my account. JKlug81 (talk) 22:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block so the connection is not in doubt, as it is supported with private technical evidence. You'll need to explain why technical evidence would indicate that you are a sock if you actually aren't. 331dot (talk) 23:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.