User talk:JacHarv
Welcome!
Hi JacHarv! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lyle, Lyle, Crocodile (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Heather Leviara (aka Green 34) 16:44, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
January 2023
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Dorsetonian (talk) 14:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Ma&Ya’s, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 07:43, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to M&M's, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 10:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Links to draft articles
April 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Vyond. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- I have now started a conversation on the Talk:Vyond page. Feel free to join in. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
The article Proposed acquisition of Warner-Paramount merger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A merger has not been formally proposed by either company, only reports at this point.
WP:CRYSTAL. Title is malformed and not a good redirect candidate.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DigitalIceAge (talk) 08:06, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
To clarify, I think it's in our best interest to wait for either WBD or Paramount to formally announce the merger. For comparison, we did not create
Nomination of Proposed Warner Bros. Discovery-Paramount merger for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proposed Warner Bros. Discovery-Paramount merger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.DigitalIceAge (talk) 23:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)