User talk:JackW2016

I think you rashed the judgment. I was editing the original links, which were many links and too wordy. The aim of the article is to write about a personality that has experience and a unique personality that could fit Wikipedia conditions and roles. If you match the profile of Simo Idrissi with others it is the same as other professional profiles on Wikipedia I checked all and what they have the style all were used for Simo Idrissi, the same style used for Simo Idrissi. So when submitting the draft, Wikipedia sent a note about external links issues and looks like a resume. I had to rearrange the text and links to get rid of those that make the text look unfamiliar to Wikipedia. I knew that this draft is going to be looked at after 4 months, so I said I will update everything that fit the Wikipedia regulations. I appreciate your effort, but I will restart working on this article again to make it sound like Wikipedia even though it is similar to many other articles in the same field. I would appreciate it if you write the steps that made you judge the draft before 4 months.

Thanks JackW2016 (talk) 17:42, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JackW2016! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DoubleGrazing, Thank you for the help.

This article was created to speak about this personality with no intention of promotion or advertisement, or compensation. The subject is already known in the sports field. He does not need any advertising, even though writing about him on Wikipedia can activate these elements automatically whether we want it or not.

I volunteered to write about him without any fees. I know the person is great and honest and work hard, and has unique ideas in his field in our community. This article or any future article that I will write will never contain any connection of payment or compensation or promoting or advertising.

I don't have an advertising website, and I have no attention to creating one. This article is genuine. The purpose is to speak about this person who lives and serves our community. I think saying something good about people using Wikipedia can help build the right community too.

Thanks, Wikipedia, and I will do my best to learn and make this article happen.

Appreciate your contribution and your informative information. JackW2016 (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based on what you say ("I volunteered to write about him without any fees. I know the person") you clearly have a COI, so you need to make the necessary disclosure before editing further. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, so what is my first steps to take?

Thanks JackW2016 (talk) 19:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are investigating my relationship credibility and what I write to you. I understand what you mean by COI. I found this in the COI guidelines "Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships." none applied to my situation. I know the person based on what he is doing in life as a professional. The same other professionals have their articles all over Wikipedia.

He is not a friend, and nothing relates him to me. My attempt is volunteering to start writing an article on Wikipedia, and this is my first article. I know Wikipedia enough as a reader, and writing about this person in this great place is helpful for me to start, and at the same time, my aim is to serve the community.

Do you want someone else who doesn't know this person to write about him? Because I don't understand what you mean by COI. JackW2016 (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Previously rejected already.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JackW2016. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]