User talk:James Loughton

Hello James Loughton, and

You might like some of these links and tips:

• Some
  general guidance
  .
• Tutorial and the Manual of Style
  .
• Find out how to
  move and merge
  pages.
• Sign your posts on talk pages
  using four tildes (~~~~).
• Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
• Use the
  Show preview
  button
• Provide an
  Edit summary
• Add the correct
  image copyright tag
  to any images you upload
• Create a
  User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing,

PS: Please sign your contributions on talk pages and user talk pages but not in articles. Thanks! --JoanneB 10:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another hint: While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we'd like to point out our policy for

Hi,

I've used your name in the discussion of Michael Keith Smith. You might be interested on commenting as to why you restarted the article (I agree by the way). There's also a deletion vote on this subject which you may wish to comment to. JASpencer 21:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I have just added.

As a lawyer my interest primarily stemmed from the legal case he was involved in. As a socialist I also have a casual interest in movements on the far right.

I'm intrigued by the behaviour of Ed Chilvers, who was obviously once a close friend of Smith.James Loughton 13:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A further development:

http://www.lvl9.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1315

Just to keep you informed as although Chilvers doesn't seem too bad, Williams (Gos) can be rather vindictive (see here).

I don't think that Ed Chilvers was politically aligned with Smith, but an ex-friend whose friendship has obviously gone very, very sour.

JASpencer 22:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks James. Sorry not to reply before but I have been abroad.

Yes it is my impression that Smith and Chilvers were friends who fell out. I have seen some of Williams's past posts. She seems to be utterly deranged. James Loughton 17:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Jill Haworth. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://imdb.com/name/nm0370371/bio in this case) or from printed material.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the
  GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jill Haworth
  with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the
  GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Jill Haworth
  with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. 24.98.132.123 15:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Clapp (artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Clapp (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Clapp (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 17:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]