User talk:Jason.r.newell

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what's wrong, but your sigs are not the required minimum. There are no active links back to your userspace. Maybe your preferences need to be tweaked. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 06:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probably, plus I'm using mobile which is equally clunky. I need that "wise and beautiful editor". I'll check my sig from my PC. Thank you jrn-hsv 06:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:15, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Twitter Files. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:12, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this is not possible with "editors" like soibangla, who is a notorious propagandist. How is it possible to maintain neutrality when this guy is blatantly biased??? jrn-hsv (talk) 21:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I find that an ironically tone deaf comment coming from you. We all have our biases, and you are quite obviously not free from bias, so your accusations are just pointless personal attacks and unhelpful.

Editorial bias is normally only problematic when it affects editing or leads to attacking other editors, as you have done. So start all over and AGF at all times. We must all work together, and if you treat this as a

battlefield, you'll just create disruption and get blocked. We don't want that. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]