User talk:Javito1993

Hi Javito1993! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MrE. Your recent edit(s) to the page Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MrE (talk) 22:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, check your information before publishing. All data must correspond to this chart. Plus, you keep adding incomplete information to the graphs. Add all the info to the charts, it becomes hard to check what was updated and what was not. — MrE (talk) 21:40, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please refrain from doing unconstructive edits such as this one. If you want to update any info, please wait until the numbers are actually released instead of adding empty spaces to the graphs. There is no point in doing so and doesn't add anything of use or interest to the article.

Also, this is a friendly reminder that

@CodeMars04: The sources I used to edit the page COVID-19 pandemic in Colombia are government-based, primarily the Twitter account MinSaludCol (@MinSaludCol) which the official account of the Colombian Ministry of Health. I apologise I was not able to keep track of the Talk page for a few days (thus, did not see your message till a few days ago) but happy to discuss any matter next time I edit this page on Wikipedia. Javito1993 (talk) 06:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. While I acknowledge that your edits of new confirmed cases and deaths were correct and matched government updates, I would like you to consider for the future that MinSalud does also release updates on new recoveries and testing, so you could have also updated the daily recoveries since it would seem contradictory to keep the graphs for cases and deaths updated daily but not the one for recoveries, which are updated by the government at the same time. Likewise, I'll be glad to discuss any further concern you might have on the matter, but in the meantime I sincerely hope you can sort out this misunderstanding with your account. CodeMars04 (talk) 17:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — MrE (talk) 00:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia, you may be blocked from editing. Flix11 (talk) 09:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina. — MrE (talk) 20:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Flix11 (talk) 09:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Flix11: Unvalid warning as sources used for updating Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) are government-based: 1) Twitter account Kemenkes IR (@KemenkesIR) - Ministry of Health of Indonesia, 2) COVID-19 Dashboard Indonesian Government - https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran, 3) Twitter account Natural Disaster Management Agency of Indonesia (@BNBP_Indonesia). Javito1993 (talk) 10:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None of them updated before you (16:12 local, 9:12 UTC). BNPB updated on 18:17 (11:17 UTC). The go.id was going bust with server and the KemenkesRI updated on 16:39 (9:39 UTC). The earliest per Google search was on 16:18 (9:18 local). So where did your data (which stated 4 less cases despite "3" and "7" buttons are faraway on both actual computer/laptop keyboard and virtual keyboard on full screen cellphones; thought a typo but couldn't because of this) come from? At least give the link on edit summary. Flix11 (talk) 13:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Flix11: Likely a typo error as deaths and recoveries data were accurate. Javito1993 (talk) 05:36, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, please stop adding incorrect and/or incomplete information to the page. Check your sources before publishing or I'll report you. — MrE (talk) 21:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Javito1993 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I maintain the following Wikipedia pages up to date with government-based data daily to prevent them falling out of date: -Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany -Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in India -Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru -Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia -COVID-19 pandemic in Japan -COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan -COVID-19 pandemic in Chile -COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal Wikipedia users administering the following pages have warned me from stopping editing these pages, however when I do edit them I add government-based data and did not intend to disrupt or affect in any manner those pages. It’s more of a “who gets to edit the page first” issue: -Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina -Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Colombia -Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia I don’t mind being blocked from editing but I’m afraid those pages I mentioned above will fall out of date. Here, I intended to help but clearly some Wikipedia pages are assigned specific users so other users cannot edit them without the previous approval or communication

Decline reason:

There were several attempts to communicate with you for over a week. Have you read the comments above? Do you see what the problem was the resulted in your block? HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 00:51, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@

Sigh, the mobile version has been such a blight. We really do need to depend on talk page communication. I have no objection if any admin wants to respond to the review request differently. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 07:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the only way to find a solution to this issue is having one administrator from wikipedia assigning me specific pages (i.e. countries) to edit in regards to COVID-19 pandemic statistics. Clearly pages like the one from Argentina and Colombia are already maintained by other well intentioned editors like myself and I do not intend to edit or compete for editing with them. Javito1993 (talk) 10:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we don't work that way. Admins are not anyone's bosses here, and I wouldn't want to be that way. The most I could tell you is to pick some of those other pages yourself and work on them. Daniel Case (talk) 17:25, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As Daniel rightly says, that's not really how things work on Wikipedia. Nobody "owns" certain pages. The only thing you need to understand is, if you're going to edit a certain page, you are expected to strive for consensus with other interested editors about how to edit it, and you need to be ready to talk about that. And if other people politely ask you to avoid certain types of edit, it's usually a good idea to avoid them.

That said, as far as I'm concerned, you'd be certainly welcome to continue editing the German statistics page the way you were doing it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:31, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Glad to hear we have reached an agreement here. Will check the talk site and communicate clearly with other editors in future editing. Javito1993 (talk) 02:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know my user/IP address continues to be blocked. Javito1993 (talk) 02:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you weren't unblocked yet. I've unblocked now, per the discussion above. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MrE: Your unfounded accusations of disruptive editing to the page Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina resulted in block of my user profile in Wikipedia for 4 days and unfortunately due to this, the pages I was editing for with government based data (e.g. Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in India, Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal) have fallen out of date. In addition, the sources I used to edit the page Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina are https://www.argentina.gob.ar/salud/coronavirus-COVID-19/sala-situacion - Official COVID-19 Dashboard of the Argentine Ministry of Health, which you do not seem to fully follow as you sometimes miss 1 to 2 deaths in the "Daily deaths" chart. Please consider no one is the owner of any Wikipedia page. I'm sure if we communicate effectively we can reach to an agreement.