User talk:Jaypatel111

The

Adventure

Hi Jaypatel111!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi talk) 17:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply ]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1000 to 1: The Cory Weissman Story, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESZfLTH6tFY.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to 1000 to 1: The Cory Weissman Story with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend that you read this, before continuing with your editions in

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 04:27, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 04:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the last name of individuals in biography articles, as it is more encyclopaedic. Also, please consider running your edits through a spell/grammar check before adding them. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 03:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not add extensive character descriptions to bio articles. Such information should go in the articles about the relevant movies or TV shows. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 03:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chalk It Up, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Fowler. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucas Black, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All the Pretty Horses. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hi there. In this edit, you added content which is the same as at this site. Did you copy paste it to Wikipedia? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More

I have encountered another possible copyright violation:

• Your addition to Wikipedia: [1]
• Source: [2]

Editors who persistently add copyrighted material to articles may be blocked from editing. You have been warned about this before. If you copy paste again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Simply, please write in your own words. Please do not copy paste again, okay? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More

• Addition
• Source

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You just added more copy pasted content in this edit from here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaypatel111. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to Ross Lynch seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 06:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you've been warned about the use of 'rowspan' in

WP:FILMOGRAPHY tables before – just please stop trying to use 'rowspan' in those. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Jaypatel111. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jaypatel111. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All Hallows' Eve (2016 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Hallows' Eve (2016 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Matthew - (talk) 01:56, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:25, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]