User talk:Jcmenal

Archives

2007, 2008

Please stop reverting on Template:Central America topic and start a discussion on the talk page or another related talk page (with a link from the talk page) to gather clear consensus. The current revert-warring will not help the problem. Regards SoWhy 10:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please be advised that you are revert warring on Geography of Mexico, and have done so 4 times in a short while. Stop. 69.158.150.169 (talk) 23:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I removed the prod. You might want to update the page as it says it's not a CONCACAF member and it didn't play a match against Belize. The fist time I looked at the external I didn't see the match as I searched for Miquelon and this time I looked for Pierre. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 06:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:51, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will you kindly explain your reasons for revert? 78.146.56.46 (talk) 17:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The term Latin America came from a common language root, not from religion issues. Religion has its own sub-section in the culture section.Jcmenal (talk) 18:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted against consensus though, and against sources. 78.146.56.46 (talk) 18:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Caribbean Football Union Logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

24h for edit warring / incivility at Template:Countries of Central America William M. Connolley (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

incivility?, naming racist to a user who clearly has a racist behivor is not incivility, beside user 69.158.150.169 ‎(a.k.a. 216.234.60.106, Corticopia and many other alias) uses offensive language as you can read in the article's history. Jcmenal (talk) 20:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"but he started it" didn't work in school; it won't work here either William M. Connolley (talk) 07:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt requested a block revision, just check user behivor along the last months and years.Jcmenal (talk) 19:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jcmenal-

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the statement regarding IFFHS' All-Time Club World Ranking. There exists only one All-Time ranking, and the statement states the fact: Club America is the highest ranked Mexican and CONCACAF club in this ranking.

Stop changing the sentence around, because not only do you make grammatical errors, you also are implying that there have been many of these rankings. The sentence that you added should state that in IFFHS' monthly club world ranking, Club America is tied for fifth with Atlante; emphasis on the separate ranking.

I noticed that you wrote a comment on your revision saying that it is not just a Mexican ranking, I stated clearly that it is the All-Time Club WORLD Ranking-- If you would like I can add the fact that Club America is also the highest ranked CONCACAF team.

--Bajopresion (talk) 22:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change the 1949 winners to Anguilla? ANTIGUA won the championship, as stated on RSSSF. 92.3.99.90 (talk) 03:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops, my bad. I confused both national football teams. Jcmenal (talk) 04:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[1] The newest Corticopia. It was just a matter of time after Administrators blocked several pages in which he edit-warred anonymously. So, be notified. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 12:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed

Also note that maps published by the Mexican government do not indicate the Channel Islands as Mexican territory. --Amble (talk) 01:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• You reverted the article after the issuance of this warning, thus, with some reluctance, I have filed a report at
  the Administrators' Noticeboard for Edit Warring. HJ Mitchell | fancy a chat? 19:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jcmenal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I restored the changes that user Talpis done without any talk/discussion, apparently the account was created to make such changes in English and Spanish wiki, please check the user contributions.

Decline reason:

The only exception to the

vandalism

. I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  • understand what you have been blocked for,
  • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our

talk) 21:15, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please see

New comment. Esmito (talk) 23:23, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't reverse me without commenting in

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Ive noticed you've made some changed to this article but you've added no citations to back up some pretty substantial changes in facts. Ive rolled them back only because of this. If you have sources for the information you want to add, please feel free to put the info back in with the cite info.Thelmadatter (talk) 13:27, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 04:14, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you like it. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 16:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

North America is Canada, Mexico and the United States. Deal with it!

Hi. Since you indicated an interest at

]

WikiProject North America

Another editor has noticed your contributions to articles related to North America, and would like to invite you to join WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve coverage of North America on Wikipedia.

AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 08:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Juan Carlos.

Soy Hernan Gastelum y estoy feliz de encontrarte, un wikipediano cachanilla, crei que estaba solo aqui.

De hecho admito que encontre un par mas pero en la wikipedia en español y yo travajo principal sino es que unicamente en la wikipedia en ingles.

A ver si algun dia nos encontramos, no tengo a nadie con quien hablar de wikipedia jajaja. SI una vez ocupas algo, solo avisame. Vivo en Jardines de lago jajaja. VIVA MEXICO Zidane tribal (talk) 00:30, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zidane tribal (talk) 00:30, 24 June 2011 (UTC) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}![reply]

I've noticed your contributions on pages relating to Tijuana. We encourage you to join WikiProject Tijuana where we are working to expand, improve, and standardize all articles related to Tijuana on Wikipedia. If you would like more information on what needs to and can be done, please visit the project page. If you have any questions, please feel free join the discussion on our talk page.

08OceanBeach^S.D. 11:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Qué onda Juan Carlos qué gusto ver que retomas tu gusto por Wikipedia. Neta que sí, qué gusto wey. Saludos. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 09:33, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before I moved the borough articles back to a may reasonable disambiguation title I thought I might ask where the format for Baja California boroughs is located so I wouldn't go against a formatting policy previously unbeknownst to me. Perhaps you could enlighten me, as it would be much appreciated. 08OceanBeach^S.D. 21:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where exactly in your reference does it explicitly says that the Mexican League is a "second level" league behind the Mexican Pacific League? (Reference you provided) Also, it's not "second level", it would be "tier 2". (I'm not pointing that out in a crude mean-spirited way)

First of all, playing in a

-- Marco Guzman, Jr  Chat  01:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  helpme
  }} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:11, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited

CFU Club Championship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Harbour View and Digicel Premiere League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

CBTA (High school) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Chihuahua and Hidalgo

CBTIS (High school) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Chihuahua and Hidalgo

CEB (High school) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Chihuahua and Hidalgo

CETIS (High school) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Chihuahua and Hidalgo

Preparatoria Federal (Mexico) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Chihuahua and Hidalgo

CETAC (High school) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Hidalgo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jcmenal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why I was blocked

Decline reason:

I see no indication that this account is blocked. What message are you getting that makes you think you're blocked? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:25, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Jcmenal. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]