User talk:JeffUK

Thanks for the clarification! That was helpful. Just blocked the account. ceranthor 15:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

DanCherek (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am declaring that I haven't provided any self-contradictory articles on Wikipedia. And that many of the " sources " on wikipedia is self-contradictory. And I have provided refutations against those self-contradictory articles on wikipedia that is filled with misinformations. But as it is clashing with someone's personal opinion, they keep reverting My edits without providing any counter refutations. And when I have filled complaint against that person, few other people whose opinion is similar to that person started being bigoted and trying to suppress the sources that I havw provided. Kindly inform Me the steps that I need to take in order to take action against them. Thanks. Gorgon Slayer (talk) 11:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pls check my replies in my User talk:Bob4us about notability of Hell Theater article. Thanx Bob4us (talk) 15:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job on the BLPN closure! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this was not a test, it would not say 'This is a test' JeffUK 09:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JeffUK,

This is to let you know that, in the recent RfC about the rollback from V2022 to V2010, I moved your comment from the section dedicated to the width question to the general "support" section, as you said that with your comment you wanted to support the general rollback. If it's wrong, please correct it. Æo (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JeffUK! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 15:27, Tuesday, January 24, 2023 (

You are correct. I genuinely believed that the Antigua KNH honorees were not entitled to use the prenomials/titles Sir and Dame. I investigated after you and another editor advised me that my edits were problematic. You credited me as a good faith editor in your edit summary ("Reverted good faith edits by 107.122.161.37 (talk): "In Antigua and Barbuda, Knights Companion of the Order may use the title "Sir" in front of their forename" Also as per WP:COMMONNAME they named a stadium after him with 'Sir..'").

So how did I go from good faith to final vandal warning? By being thorough? I am not a vandal as you would see if you reviewed my edits. Please remove the vandalism warning from my talk page. The neighbors will complain as it lowers the real estate values, LOL 😆. Yours, 107.122.161.37 (talk) 23:28, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

you are permitted to remove warnings listed on your own talk page, right? Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 23:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Sure but it means more if the person who left it reverts it. I am just too sentimental.107.122.161.37 (talk) 00:01, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:107.122.161.37 The reason for the rapid escalation of the warnings, is that you seem to edit extremely quickly (to a point I wasn't sure if you were a human or a bot...), and I was trying to get your attention before you went through several dozen KNH holders and made a change to them against consensus. I do recognise you normally make good edits that are valuable, you'll notice I didn't revert your changes wholesale, only those that made this specific change. JeffUK 08:01, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, glad you are here @Kirbanzo, this way I can show you and Jeff what I found: "In Antigua and Barbuda, Knights Companion of the The Most Distinguished Order of the Nation may use the prefix ‘Sir’ in front of their forename, and their wives may use the title ‘Lady’ in front of their husband’s surname. Similarly, Dames Companion of the Order may use the title ‘Dame’ in front of their forename. No specific privilege exists for their husbands. The Order of the National Hero was first established and constituted by the Parliament of Antigua and Barbuda under the National Heroes Act 1994, in 1998 reestablished and most recently amended in 2015",

however, recipients of Jamaican state honours do not have the right to Sir/Dame prenomials/titles. "Members of these [Jamaica National Hero] orders are not entitled to the prefix of Sir" ([1]), according to Bob Juchter van Bergen Quast (CEO - Swiss Chamber of Commerce in The Netherlands, President - Court of Arbitration of the European Chamber of Digital Commerce). Interesting, right? 107.122.161.37 (talk) 00:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jeff! What a great image you added. I mentioned you in the talk page for the article, asking if you could by any chance reproduce the image with a neutral white background, and maybe slightly darker overtones for the tetrahedra so that they match a little more closely (they already match) with the top and lateral perspective images of the compound that are also included. Thank you again, beautiful work (I actually love the pink background, but I think users would prefer white). Radlrb (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is the strangest mirror. They seems to have paid meticulous attention to image copyright across various timeframes and countries, and then just completely ripped off the Wikipedia text on every page without the correct license or attribution? Hopefully they read the notice you sent. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you offer your thoughts regarding the question I asked here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeff, I wanted to alert you to this request on the Craig Newmark article talk page. It is based off our previous conversation on re- organizing the ''Philanthropy'' section into categories. Much thanks for reviewing. Cnewmark (talk) 22:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff I am hoping to both factually correct and include all that Joshua Hughes Paul achieved in his wikipedia history. He was an amazing man, educator, public speaker and my great grandfather. The edits I proposed were documented and published by the historian of the Univ of Utah and historians by the church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. His list of authored books was from the library of congress. I didnt use any of my own thoughts just what is published by reputable authors. Can you reverse your acceptance of my suggested edits so the record stands corrected and accurate. I admit I am not fully knowledgeable about how to make, edit or suggest corrections on wikipedia. Please let me know if there is a more appropriate process to follow. If its easier to connect live please let me know. I am happy to share my mobile number and personal email. Best MHP2601:681:6180:2140:A947:14B4:2E24:7721 (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my wifi user talk name is RockyMtn2

thanks RockyMtn2 (talk) 17:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JeffUK:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2400 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1194558055 ExoField (talk) 16:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]