User talk:JesusisGreat7

Hi JesusisGreat7. Thank you for your work on Bajinder Singh. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! May you and your family have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Active Hours My office active hours are between 13:30 UTC and 18:30 UTC and for Sundays/Holidays its from 04:30 UTC to 14:30 UTC. You will not get a reply between 19:00 UTC and 3:00 UTC.

Hi JesusisGreat7. Thank you for your work on Floods in Venezuela. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A brief article, but a topic that warrants coverage here and doesn't seem to duplicate existing content. It would be helpful to include other events here, and perhaps move to having a category to cover the floods, as we have for other types of natural disasters in Venezuala.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 09:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: I am thinking to add the list of floods to in the same page that I had created mentioning all the floods events that have occured in the country!! JesusisGreat7 (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that sounds like a good idea. Klbrain (talk) 11:27, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JesusisGreat7. I recently approved a cloak for your account on IRC, but unfortunately I made a mistake when checking your eligibility for the cloak. You currently are not eligible for a Wikimedia cloak on IRC due to your Wikipedia account not yet being 3 months old. I'm not going to remove the cloak only to re-add it in a week or two, but please bear this in mind in places that your cloak gives you privileges you shouldn't make use of those privileges yet. stwalkerster (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will wait for the timeline thanks for approving my cloak, I promise I will work for the betterment of the community!! JesusisGreat7 (talk) 14:57, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting updation of chess grand tour Romania classic 2025 as the event has already finished. 117.202.83.197 (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. I’m not familiar with chess, so I’m unable to update the event, sorry about that! 👑 Jesus isGreat7 👑 | 📜 Royal Talk 06:21, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JesusisGreat7. Thank you for your work on Mother Teresa Birth Centenary commemorative coin. Another editor, Noleander, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This article appears to have few (or no) other articles linking to it. If possible, you should look for other, related topics, and edit them to include links to this article (if appropriate).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Noleander (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Noleander Thanks! I’ve linked it to the Coins of the Indian Rupee article. I’ll definitely find more soon! Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 04:56, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Old-AgedKid Thanks! :)) Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 11:18, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your tagging of

, patrollers are supposed to wait at least an hour from the last meaningful contribution before tagging a page (except speedy criteria). This mostly serves to give editors (especially newcomers) a chance to continue working on the page without feeling they are immediately harassed. In the future, please try to wait at least an hour before tagging pages in this way.

Happy editing! Garsh (talk) 17:44, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Garsh2 Sorry, but the page does not cite any sources at all. I also removed several errors and promotional lines that appeared to be AI-generated, which may be considered spam. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 17:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you are free to constructively edit the article within one hour. The hour policy is only for maintenance tags and draftification. The idea is that even though the article may clearly have no sources, the original author is considered to still be working on the article since it was edited within an hour. Garsh (talk) 17:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Garsh2 Got it. I'll keep this in mind next time. Thanks for the reminder! Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 17:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JesusisGreat7,

Thank you for reviewing my draft submission on Zack Zook. I appreciate your time and the guidance provided. I’d like to clarify that multiple references in the draft meet the notability criteria as outlined in WP:N and WP:BIO — including significant coverage in The New York Times, Publishers Weekly, Brooklyn Magazine, and WTJX (PBS affiliate), among others. These are reliable, independent secondary sources with substantial detail about the subject’s work and public contributions.

I’m happy to improve the article in any specific areas you believe are lacking or need formatting adjustments. Please feel free to advise. I’m following Wikipedia’s COI guidelines and welcome community input.

Thank you again for your time. Baranauma (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

WP:LEADCITE), the tone needs to be more formal (per WP:NPOV), and it currently reads like an advertisement. Once these are fixed, feel free to resubmit. Let me know if you have any questions! Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 19:00, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi @JesusisGreat7, thanks for the helpful feedback. I’ve revised the lead to include inline citations for major claims (per WP:LEADCITE), formalized the tone throughout the draft to meet WP:NPOV standards, and removed promotional language. Additional third-party sources have also been added to support content across sections. I’ve resubmitted the draft for review — appreciate your time! Baranauma (talk) 21:28, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @JesusisGreat7,

thank you for reviewing my draft about Correns Corporation. Kindly be asked to point out which sources are from your point of view not adequate and why exactly. I have now often seen this boiler plate with 4 criterias, but conclude that my resources meet those criterias. Nevertheless, kindly be asked to help to sit straight and learn why my sources may not be suitable. Merged account (talk) 02:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Russia and South Ossetia ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. Moreover, THE OSSETIAN SNOW REVOLUTION WAS EARLIER. These are two different events. 31.202.71.56 (talk) 08:07, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the title "Snow Revolution" has already been redirected to the article on the 2011–2013 Russian protests. To avoid confusion, I have changed the draft title to "2011 South Ossetia election protests." You may continue your work and improve the draft under this revised title. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 08:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up on Draft: Salman Shaheen

Hi there - thank you for your recent review of my draft. I consulted with the live help desk who didn't think the piece read as overly promotional, suggesting I could "tighten up some of the language, [as] some of it is a bit emotive." I've gone ahead and tried to address that, but before I resubmitted the page, I wanted to check with you if you would accept a tightened version of the page that follows those instructions, or if there was any other advice on further changes you would like to see me make? Many thanks. AlfredKlein99 (talk) 09:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AlfredKlein99, thanks for the update. The draft looks fine now. If you'd like to tighten it further, consider adding an infobox. Also, if there are any more independent sources, feel free to include them. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 10:04, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly, @JesusisGreat7! Will do. AlfredKlein99 (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and added the infobox as you'd suggested @JesusisGreat7 and resubmitted. I don't suppose you'd be able to review the draft now and approve if its looking up to scratch? AlfredKlein99 (talk) 13:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A.A.Murakami Rejected

Hi, I would like to ask for some advice. I feel that I didn't write anything that was opinionated and I thought I was being pretty neutral. Can you help me point out two instances where I wasn't being neutral so I can get a better idea please? Thank you. Khh57 (talk) 14:10, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Khh57 Hi, Just to clarify, the draft wasn’t rejected, only declined. It still needs some work. Right now, it reads a bit like a résumé, and the line “A.A. Murakami frequently draws inspiration from ancient cultures and historical traditions” is backed by a personal user website, which isn’t a reliable source. Once these issues are fixed, consider resubmitting it. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 06:02, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice. Yes, I meant declined sorry for the wrong word. New to this! Khh57 (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kashvi (name)

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 03:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply

]