User talk:Noleander

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply

Regarding Marget Sanger revision of 05:22, 9 January 2025, whether or not you're logged in to archive.org, it seems that it's possible to verify that page 57 states that the Sangers joined Socialist Party Local 5. Fabrickator (talk) 05:04, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I added that page to the cite. Noleander (talk) 05:41, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I may have given you a link that makes it hard to read the text ... try this one instead. From that link, you can do searches to find other text. Search for a sequence of words by enclosing them in quotes, using the magnifying glass. Fabrickator (talk) 06:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks. I've updated the article to contain the correct range of pages. Noleander (talk) 06:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Margaret Sanger you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Margaret Sanger for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I really valued your feedback earlier on the FAC page and wanted to check if you had any additional thoughts when you have time. Your insights have been helpful! Cherfc (talk) 16:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update, especially on my Talk page—really appreciate you making sure I saw your comments. I've added alt texts for all the images. As for the section names, I've explained my reasoning on the FAC page, but I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on it. Let me know if you think anything else needs adjusting!

By the way, I'm also looking for some input on a

Cher in Concert article to "Take Me Home Tour (Cher)". I'd really value your thoughts on that as well, if you have a moment. Thanks again! Cherfc (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

Ancaster Incident

Hello, You have been paired at

Ancaster Incident

. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit

WT:GARC#Circle #22

.

History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply

The article Margaret Sanger you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Margaret Sanger for comments about the article, and Talk:Margaret Sanger/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tomobe03 -- Tomobe03 (talk) 22:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should the Kansas City Chiefs change their team name due to the George Floyd protests? I know the Redskins/Commanders did so in 2020–22, but now I think the Chiefs should drop the "Chiefs" moniker for good due to the protests. 2601:40A:8400:1820:F12D:3895:CF63:1664 (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewers Award
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Noleander! The article you nominated, Margaret Sanger, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, FrB.TG (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, You have been paired at

History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 12:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of lynching victims in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Silent Parade you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Silent Parade for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 23:44, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you for your help with getting Veiqia to FA Lajmmoore (talk) 09:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, based on your directions at The Featured Article Candidates, I have applied for Hindustani-speaking world to be peer-reviewed. Could you please go over the article and then leave a message at my talk page or on this thread below? Shubhsamant09 (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Shubhsamant09: - Yes, I can do a peer review of that article. Noleander (talk) 22:47, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you so much for peer reviewing the article. I went over the map, and instead created a new one with sources cited so its accuracy is not disputable. At the end of the page, I've added the topics like you mentioned and have simplified the citations without the quotes. Thank you once again. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Shubhsamant09 Okay. I am about 1/3 of the way done with the peer review. I will look at your changes you recently made. I will let you know when I am done with the peer review. Noleander (talk) 23:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I went over your review thoroughly, ractified the article according, and have submitted the article for the GA category. Thank you once again for reviewing.

The GA review -

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hindustani-speaking_world/GA1&action=edit&editintro=Template:GAN/editintro&preload=Template:GAN/preload Shubhsamant09 (talk) 00:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Shubhsamant09: Good luck with the GA process. Be patient: you have to wait for some volunteer to find your article at GA and pick it and start a review. That can take anywhere from 1 week to 3 months. Sometimes articles fail the GA, and you simply work on them more, then they pass the second try. So if you fail the first GA, do not give up hope.

If you think the article is ready for GA, and you are in a hurry, you should consider listing the article in the "GA review circle" at WP:Good article review circles. If you list the article there, it will get reviewed within 10 days ... but you must also do a GA review on some article. I'm not saying that is a better option, but I thought you should know. Only list at WP:Good article review circles if you are positive that you can perform a decent GA review yourself on someone else's article. Noleander (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 00:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have been paired at

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 19:04, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply

The article Silent Parade you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Silent Parade for comments about the article, and Talk:Silent Parade/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of OlifanofmrTennant -- OlifanofmrTennant (talk) 02:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have been paired at