User talk:Jkennedy85

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Emily Earle. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It may just be too early. Extensive coverage of Emily Earle via independent reliable sources is required to establish notability. (Wikipedia isn't a reliable source (!), and most of the other references used provide only trivial coverage. The Bill Forman ref is great though - I'm sure there will be more to come.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Earle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 06:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jkennedy85! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 06:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does writing ghastly overblown prose come as part of the territory? I truly pity you.TheLongTone (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jkennedy85,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Cwmhiraeth and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jake Kennedy should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Kennedy .

You might like to note that such

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jkennedy85. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 22:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Kinder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Kinder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 05:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]