User talk:Jmm6f488/Archive 1

I'm not going to replace the speedy template on the article you created for Caleb Fairley, as you've added enough to the article to show notability. However, for future reference know that admins are the ones to remove speedy tags, not the the creator of the article. Cool? Precious Roy 20:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little confused about what sort of advice you want regarding integrating the task force on to the Criminal Biography page. I don't have any special expertise in this. I would just suggest trying to create a subsection and then maybe a subpage that more fully describes the task force. Remember 14:01, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at

At the moment, serial killers are covered by crime-bio-stub - I'm not overly sure that there would be enough stubs to warrant a separate type for serial killers, but if there's a WikiProject the threshold used to decide whether a new stub type is worthwhile is lowered a bit. Perhaps expanding the scope of the template and making it murderer-stub would be a good move, since it would make for a larger (and therefore more editor-friendly) category, while still making it useful to your new project. Grutness...wha? 02:11, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I thank you for inviting me to join, I really don't know that much about crime except for fictional crime in novels. If you would like me to join to help with articles regarding fiction, I would like to, but otherwise I don't really think I will be of much help. Dr. Hannibal Lecter 17:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain Meadows Massacre is not a case of serial murder. It should not be included in that evaluation --Blue Tie 12:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem man, always there to help. If you see anything unnecessary, just let me know and I'll fix it.

You'll have to give me some examples of what you are talking about, because the article has been copyedited by at least 3 other editors, so there are probably changes to sentence structure that I'm not aware of off hand. Chances are, they are my sentences, but I'm not entirely sure what you mean be "taking them out paragraph length". Are you saying their are run-on sentences, or just wordy sentences (I tend to have the latter).  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 11:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I don't think you will get many people who think killers are cool. This is wikipedia remember, not a primary school classroom! :)

I'm trying to think back to what I did with

Oh yeah, and try not to imply that you are "in charge" as that can make people iffy, use words like "lead coordinator" or something :D let me know if you have any questions! SGGH ^speak! 15:10, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you were using a fair use image on the templates related ot this task force, and I have replaced it with the "Dear Boss" Jack the Ripper letter off Commons. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 16:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason nobody picked up on the cannibalism category. I started a new CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 July 26#Category:Cannibalism among tribal societies. Please put your comments there. I agree they should be named in parallel. Rigadoun (talk) 15:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there - thanks for the invitation to become a full member of the group. I'd be happy to do so - I've had little time in the last couple of months to do much, but plan go get back into the swing of things as soon as possible. Though that might be curtailed if I ever find "Little Joe Shots", as I can't promise I won't do something unspeakable to him for butchering a load of the crime articles. C i d 16:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite. My areas of interest are child exploitation and abuse, forced labor, human trafficking and international arms trafficking, and I will try to improve the quality of those articles on wikipedia. Regards. Chwyatt 16:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I removed your task forces tag from the top of this article's page for the following reasons a)the talk page is currently cluttered with projects that have "claimed" and "assessed" this article, none of whom seem to have actually contributed to the article and b)

Hello there - thanks for the invitation to become a full member of the group. I'd be happy to do so - I've had little time in the last couple of months to do much, but plan go get back into the swing of things as soon as possible. Though that might be curtailed if I ever find "Little Joe Shots", as I can't promise I won't do something unspeakable to him for butchering a load of the crime articles. C i d 16:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite. My areas of interest are child exploitation and abuse, forced labor, human trafficking and international arms trafficking, and I will try to improve the quality of those articles on wikipedia. Regards. Chwyatt 16:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your message on my talk page. I actually attempt not to promote any particular viewpoint on Wikipedia, other than upholding the general guidelines of the project. The problem, as I see it, is that certain users like SqueakBox are letting their own emotionalism regarding this very controversial topic prevent them from editing properly. For example, in the past SqueakBox has simply blanked, redirected, merged, and outright deleted articles without any consensus to do so. Recently, he has taken to nominating articles for deletion that are clearly notable, such as the article on NAMBLA. I have vocally opposed some of his more disruptive and out-of-process actions, and for this I have been labeled a pervert, a troll, and a "pedophile activist" by him.

SqueakBox seems to believe that the only way to promote a neutral point of view regarding these articles is to scrap them altogether, particularly when the articles are related to people or groups with viewpoints similar to NAMBLA. However, there are several fundamental values of Wikipedia, including comprehensiveness of encyclopedic knowledge and opposition to censorship, that clearly warrant these articles remaining. Just as we can objectively document the views of marijuana advocates or abortion advocates or any other activists out there, we can objectively document peoples' views concerning a subject such as this.

SqueakBox is temporarily banned at the moment, I believe, for a violation of the 3RR at a PAW-related article. Anyway, regardless of your knowledge regarding this topic, it's nice to have another person keeping their eye on these articles, and I invite you to do so. It's always helpful to have an outside person offer an objective opinion concerning the disputes that occasionally arise. Mike D78 22:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just replied to one of your comments on SqueakBox's talk page. Mike D78 10:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am making progress with

Thanks a lot for your comment on my talk page. Originally I only wanted to expand

Black Metal Inner Circle

.

Regarding your other comment: I don't know if I already speak English "like a professional writer". While my vocabulary is probably fine, I still have problems with capitalization and grammar. Zara1709 13:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for leaving your comment on my talk page about my West Virginia userbox. I do have to agree with what you said. Politics rule 18:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Though I wonder how long I stand researching NAMBLA and why they like fucking kids. *shudder* ForestAngel 00:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a short notice: As I somehow had expected, controversy has appeared at Lords of Chaos (book). I think your opinion could be helpful. Zara1709 16:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help so far. I would have replied earlier, but this edit war has upset me so much that I had a hard time writing anything at all. Regardless of how this turns out, I am better of taking a break from Wikipedia after it.

The exact translation for, "Dies hängt unter anderem mit den Verstrickungen von Michael Moynihan in die rechte bis rechtsextremistische Szene zusammen." is: 'This has partly to do something with the entanglements of Michael Moynihan into the right till extreme right scene.'

I am now going to work a little more on the article. Zara1709 00:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy! On the Anna Svidersky AfD you expressed sentiments to keep the content regarding the notability of the aftermath following her death. I recently created the Mourning sickness article with a section ascribed to Svidersky and the reaction to her death. My intent is to respect the content that you and other "Keep advocates" have wished to retain but still maintain the encyclopedic focus on what is actually notable about Anna Svidersky. If you have an opportunity, feel free to review the article and give me any feedback about what I can do to improve it. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 08:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were right at first to transclude the Scientific peer review in the peer review page. That would ensure that the discussion takes place in one place. It is quite common. I was just about to do exactly that, when I noticed you had done it. Now I see you have changed it. It is up to you. You can have two separate discussions or just one, and the one can be either way. --Bduke 08:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You did ask for a Peer review by adding {{Wikipedia:Scientific peer review/Pedophilia}} and the other one to

fixed, cool thanks, Jmm6f488 08:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is fine now. --Bduke 22:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone is trying to delete Christine Young again. I thought you might like to know. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Young (2nd nomination) Jmm6f488 06:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me a reason why she passes WP:PORNBIO? Has she won any awards? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 17:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She is quite famous. Honestly though to be quite honest she looks like a girl I dated in High School that's why I voted keep. If you want to delete it I won't object. sighhhh the good old days. Jmm6f488 17:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"She is quite famous" doesn't cut it in AfD; you need to have specific reasons to keep an article, and WP:PORNBIO guides us here. For example, is she notable with a genre? I don't think looking young is a particular genre within porn, but you never know. Has she won any pornographic awards? Is there a source you have that explains why she's so important? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 18:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for replying to your message so late I have been away from my computer. I would like to become a full member. Skosem 21:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am new at nominating so could use your advice. The reason I nominated these articles is that there is a constant struggle going on between two sides of the article. One side wants to make pedophiles seem like victims of societies Victorian ideas about sexuality the other side wants to sensationalize pedophilia. Although I find sex with children reprehensible in all forms I think that these articles can be written in a similar vein to say holocaust denial. I think both topics speak for themselves without any need to exaggerate. (I'm mean come on sex with children doesn't effect them and that Hitler didn't want to kill Jews.) I'm rambling but any advice would be appreciated. Jmm6f488 20:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I try to avoid controversial topics like the plague, for the very reason you've brought up. Even if the article is brought into alignment with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, it still needs constant tending to maintain that perspective. Sorry, I don't have a better suggestion for you. — RJH (talk) 15:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you probably realize, there are now 2 articles, CCNM, and CCM 1st ed. I suggest you merge the content of the 1st ed. into the main article, without the links to particular murderers. I'm not sure about the classification of crimes, but try to include it. I dont think dealing with the problems by having duplicate articles is either necessary or advisable. DGG (talk) 00:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those links are simply not appropriate. this is an article about the CCM, not about murder. I strongly suggest you remove them yourself. And that you immediately combine the two articles, as otherwise their present state is very likely to get them both noticed for deletion. DGG (talk) 18:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will wait till you get a single article finished. DGG (talk) 19:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I changed my mind and decided to go ahead & delete the detailed contents. Consider carefully what you want to do. Further discussion on article page DGG (talk) 19:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi there, just to let you know that your category
  Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories). The discussion can be found here. There is also the chance that Category:American (USA) black metal may subsequently be listed, per the same reasons. Cheers, happy editing and good work on crime and metal music! Jdcooper 02:43, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Yeah, that's cool, its not a controversial renaming by any means! Jdcooper 02:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you have recently created a whole bunch of musical group categories, like

Hi, yes "Australian black metal musical groups" would probably be the best name, since it matches the parent category and other metal group categories. And yeah, the categories can and probably should be nominated for renaming as a group. It's a little tricky, but not too hard, and if you say something like "I recently created these categories, and would like them renamed for consistency" in your nomination, people will happily overlook or correct any mistakes you might make. If you get stuck or can't figure it out, let me know, and I'll see what I can do to help. Cheers, Xtifr _tälk 04:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For countries that only have one or two entries, you can make a category, but you don't have to, and sometimes it's better not to--especially if you're dealing with a sub-genre like black metal, where you could use a broader category. Admins are not supposed to delete small categories if they're part of an established schema like

WP:MUSCAT, but not all of them know that, and sometimes its just easier not to push things. So if I had, say, two Peruvian black metal groups that I wanted to categorize, I could make Category:Peruvian black metal musical groups, but I would more likely put them in both Category:Black metal musical groups and Category:Peruvian heavy metal musical groups. Which would probably already exist if there were enough of a metal scene in Peru to support two notable black metal groups--I may not have picked the best example there, but I hope you get the idea. It's a judgment call. Cheers, Xtifr _tälk 09:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

FYI, I reverted your addition of his name to the category of Canadian Serial Killers, because his trial is still ongoing. I guess you missed the rem'd note above the categories section, and the extensive discussion on the talkpage. Anchoress 03:56, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey did you know that you are mentioned by CSO as an Ephebophilia. Jmm6f488 06:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish! Being called an ephebeophile would be a step up from what they've got! Ephebophilia/

pedophile advocacy' or something, lol. It's moreso simply a personal issue involving false statements made by an independant organization, the leader of whom (Xavier) has actually been indefinately banned from Wikipedia for his methods of editing. Do you know who I could contact pertaining whether or not I'm permitted to have correspondance related to this issue up on my talk page? Tyciol 15:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

Please go to

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rockfang (talk) 11:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Jmm6f488/Archive 1 : You've received this message as you are listed as a WikiProject Horror Participant. As you may have noticed, WikiProject Horror has suffered from a lack of direction and coordination of late. A suggestion on how to improve the Project and maintain it as a viable resource has been placed up for discussion here. As a member of the Project, your voice is valued and your input is requested. Thank you, hornoir (talk) 23:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter (Volume I, no. 1 / February 2009)

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter Volume I, no. 1 / February 2009 Next issue Project news WikiProject Horror has been under reconstruction for the past month, in hopes to re-invigorate participant activity and re-activate the Collaboration of the Month department. Please take a look at the project’s redesign and post any suggestions to the new Notice Board. Spearheading this reconstruction movement has been interim coordinator Hornoir, with assistance from Bignole. An official election for Project Coordinator and Assistant Coordinator positions will be held in the coming weeks. Any active member of the project will be able to nominate for and/or vote on the positions. Please watch the coordinator’s page for developments. WikiProject Horror currently has over 2600 articles within its scope; unfortunately, 2200 remain at Start-Class or below. Please help bring some of these articles up to (at least) B-Class. An article does not have to be the current Collaboration of the Month to gain assistance from dedicated editors like you. Nemesis, an article on the fictional character from the Resident Evil series of games, was promoted to Good Article-Class in January. The current horror-related Featured Article nominee is Bride of Frankenstein (talk • review). The current horror-related Good Article-Class candidates include review), and White Dog (talk • review ). WikiProject Horror now meets all Wikipedia v. 1.0 Editorial Team criteria. Task force and related news HorrorWikiProject}} banner and their main page has been relocated to WikiProject Horror/Saw task force . A Friday the 13th WikiProject has been proposed and while the over-ridding consensus at the moment is that the scope is too small for a WikiProject proper, the proposal bears consideration as a possible task force for our project. Please comment on the proposal with your own thoughts on the matter. A Halloween task force has been proposed at the WikiProject Council. Please comment on the proposal with your support and/or thoughts on the matter. Collaboration of the Month The current Collaboration of the Month has been None. The next collaboration is due for selection on June 30, 2024, so nominate an article and/or vote on a current nomination. Announcements and open tasks WikiProject Horror Announcements and open tasks → Please place the {{WikiProject Horror}} banner in appropriate article talk pages! Current Featured Article candidates (66 achieved): None Current Good Article candidates (435 achieved ): None WikiProject Horror Peer Reviews: None Article alerts: Please check here for up-to-date information on horror-related article alerts. Cleanup listing: Please check here for a list of horror-related articles that may require some form of work done on them. The Collaboration of the Month is currently inactive. Nominations for Coordinator positions are currently ongoing. Feel free to add your name and comments. To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your username (Jmm6f488) from the Active members list and add it to the Active members not wishing to receive the Newsletter list.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 02:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter (Volume I, no. 2 / March 2009)

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter Volume I, no. 2 / March 2009 Previous issue • Next issue Project news Nominations for the Coordinator positions are now open. The nomination process will run throughout March, with voting running throughout April. Any member of Project is welcome to nominate themselves for a Coordinator position. The Project has a new Task Center, which allows any Project member to volunteer for as a Task Editor within the Project. Task Editor positions currently open include Project Promoter, Collaboration Coordinator, Peer Review Coordinator, New & Stub Article Monitor, and Article Monitor. Our first Collaboration of the Month has been selected and it is The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. Please help out in improving the article towards Featured Article-Class. Nominations for the next Collaboration of the Month are, of course, ongoing. WikiProject Horror currently has over 3000 articles within its scope; unfortunately, 2600 remain at Start-Class or below. Please help bring some of these articles up to (at least) B-Class. An article does not have to be the current Collaboration of the Month to gain assistance from dedicated editors like you. Articles promoted to Good Article-Class in February include: Eerie (comics), The Frighteners, , Left 4 Dead , and James Whale. There is one current horror-related Featured Article nominee, which is Bride of Frankenstein (talk • review). The current horror-related Good Article-Class candidates include review) and White Dog (talk • review ). A Peer Review has been requested for Friday the 13th (franchise). The review can be found here. Task force and related news A Friday the 13th WikiProject has been proposed and while the over-ridding consensus at the moment is that the scope is too small for a WikiProject proper, the proposal bears consideration as a possible task force for our project. Please comment on the proposal with your own thoughts on the matter. A Halloween task force has been proposed at the WikiProject Council. Please comment on the proposal with your support and/or thoughts on the matter. Collaboration of the Month The current Collaboration of the Month has been None. The next collaboration is due for selection on June 30, 2024, so nominate an article and/or vote on a current nomination. Announcements and open tasks WikiProject Horror Announcements and open tasks → Please place the {{WikiProject Horror}} banner in appropriate article talk pages! Current Featured Article candidates (66 achieved): None Current Good Article candidates (435 achieved ): None WikiProject Horror Peer Reviews: None Article alerts: Please check here for up-to-date information on horror-related article alerts. Cleanup listing: Please check here for a list of horror-related articles that may require some form of work done on them. The Collaboration of the Month is currently inactive. Nominations for Coordinator positions are currently ongoing. Feel free to add your name and comments. To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your username (Jmm6f488) from the Active members list and add it to the Active members not wishing to receive the Newsletter list.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Horror Newsletter Volume I, no. 3 / April 2009 Previous issue The Coordinator nomination has been extended! Please go to the nomination page now to add yourself to the election for a coordinator position. Voting will begin on May 1st. The current Collaboration of the Month (The Texas Chain Saw Massacre) has been extended by a month! The next collaboration will be selected on April 30th, 2009. Please place suggestions for the next collaboration here and/or vote on current suggestions. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 05:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] Orphaned non-free media (File:Tommy Lynn Sells.jpg) You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] P Jay Crips P Jay Crips, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P Jay Crips. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply ] Replaceable fair use Image:Joel Rifkin.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Joel Rifkin.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please: Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed }}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 21:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply ] Fair use rationale for File:Joel Rifkin.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale . If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 21:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply ]