If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials . If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission . You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here .
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironholds (talk ) 21:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant
copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information , but not as a source of sentences . This part is crucial: say it in your own words .
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials . If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission . You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here .
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
MuffledThud (
talk ) 21:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Mayor Tom Barrett.jpg , please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://northshoreexponent.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/the-negatives-tom-barrett-must-deal-with-if-he-runs-for-governor-of-wisconsin/ . As a copyright violation, File:Mayor Tom Barrett.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria . File:Mayor Tom Barrett.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
(CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Mayor Tom Barrett.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org . See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Mayor Tom Barrett.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the .
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy . Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Maxa megalon 2000 03:12, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:First Lady Jessica Doyle.jpg , please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.math.wisc.edu/~talent/honors08.html . As a copyright violation, File:First Lady Jessica Doyle.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria . File:First Lady Jessica Doyle.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
(CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy . Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Maxa megalon 2000 03:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Dennis Luginbill Free Image Reallygoodmusic.jpg , please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.reallygoodmusic.com/rgm.jsp?page=composers2&compid=123155 . As a copyright violation, File:Dennis Luginbill Free Image Reallygoodmusic.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria . File:Dennis Luginbill Free Image Reallygoodmusic.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
(CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy . Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Maxa megalon 2000 03:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Mayor Barrett.jpg , please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.espnmilwaukee.com/upload/image/Bill%20Johnson,%20Mayor%20Barrett,%20Dan%20Needles.jpg . As a copyright violation, File:Mayor Barrett.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria . File:Mayor Barrett.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the
Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
(CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Mayor Barrett.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org . See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Mayor Barrett.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the .
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy . Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Maxa megalon 2000 03:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
I have nominated Thomas Kemp , an article that you created, for deletion . I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kemp . Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Glenfarclas (talk ) 00:04, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
I removed the {{wikiquote}} and {{Commons category|Marion Janet Harron}} from Marion Janet Harron since they both gave empty results when I clicked on them. Those should only be used when there is material on the subject at Wikiquote or Commons.
Similarly, I removed fr:Thomas Kemp , de:Thomas Kemp etc. from Thomas Kemp because those are links to the French and German Wikipedias, and there are no corresponding articles. - Eastmain (talk ) 00:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
As you know, Wikipedia doesn't want photos taken from newspapers or other websites. If you can take a photo yourself of the subject of an article, such a photo would be welcome. Include as much detail as you can with the photo. If you are involved with municipal politics, you might be able to take a picture of your mayor during or just before or after a city council meeting. - Eastmain (talk ) 00:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Dennis Luginbill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Musician that does not meet WP:COI
issue.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ ]
What Wikipedia is not
").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to
sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
articles for deletion
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a
talk) 01:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thank you for uploading
image description page
.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link .
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the
talk) 00:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
[ reply ]
File Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading File:RepresentativeKastenmeier.jpg . I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link . Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged , as described on
]
I have nominated Jessica Doyle , an article that you created, for deletion . I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Doyle . Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orange Mike | Talk 02:27, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thank you for uploading
image description page
.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log .
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page . Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk ) 11:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Democratic Party of Eau Claire County, Wisconsin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unable to find third-party (pun not intended) sources for this local group.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Danger High voltage! 00:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[ reply ]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Tate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted .
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Tate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk ) 23:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Republican Party of Eau Claire County, Wisconsin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of meeting
WP:ORGCRIT
; no secondary sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk ) 14:48, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[ reply ]