User talk:Joydawg

Well done with the new CR images.Gateman1997 00:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree. Good job! Your version of the font and proportions is much closer to the real signs. --Coolcaesar 00:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shields

Question for you. What are you using to make these great shields. I'd like to complete the County Route ones if I knew your secret.Gateman1997 19:21, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would be awesome. I've been trying to muddle through them as you can see by the ones you replaced, but they're just MS Paint facimilies I've made. Hardly high quality stuff.Gateman1997 22:30, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I also love your new CA Interstate shields. Could I trouble you to replace the current one for
  Interstate 238 with a similar one?Gateman1997 04:37, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I don't believe the new ones are quite up to current standards - compare with Image:Interstate 4 (Florida).svg. Image:US DOT FHWA MUTCD SHS 2004 3-1 M1-1 600x600mm 88 NY.svg and Image:US DOT FHWA MUTCD SHS 2004 3-1 M1-1 750x600mm 678 NY.svg are templates to use to make them all match - just convert to paths after replacing the text. If you redo them, can you also upload them to commons for use on other Wikipedias? Thanks. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 06:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they need replacing. They appear identical to the Interstate 680 sign I have sitting behind me in my room. CA doesn't use the same script as other states on route markers when compared to the other states I've visited. Text is generally bold and smaller then other states.Gateman1997 10:48, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably best to use one standard for the entire country, which would be the one in the MUTCD. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 11:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For nationwide ones sure. But since these are CA specific wouldn't it make sense to use CA specific design sheilds?Gateman1997 12:14, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not when the differences are so minor. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 12:52, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm willing to leave it up to Joydawg. His design is what I see daily so I'm bias toward it.Gateman1997 22:13, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

County Shields

Hi Joydawg. I'm going to be getting back into the Co Route project and was wondering if you wanted to partner up on it. I'll do the articles and you the shields since I'm still at a loss as how to do them.Gateman1997 21:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the color scheme used by the ones that neither of us did were best. Yours were best w/ the design and font, but there were a number of them done by someone other then you or I in png format that had a good color scheme. Thanks for your hard work on this man.Gateman1997 03:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, your color scheme is fine. Stick with it ;) Gateman1997 03:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Routebox

Um... which routebox are you referring to? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 18:22, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There really isn't anything going on except for the SVG shields in CA... --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 18:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate shields

I made them exactly from the specs. If they do in fact use series D, they should change the specs - or maybe it's just contractors being lazy. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 01:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I look at it, the INTERSTATE on three-digit shields looks like it needs to be bigger (more spacing between letters). Any thoughts? --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 01:24, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, basically by hand (making a grid of shields and changing the numbers, then converting to paths and centering), then copying and pasting each into a new document. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 02:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, to make them 20px high, three-digit Interstates (California specs) should be 24px wide. State Route and U.S. Route shields should be 23px. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 02:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CA 4

It's definitely not centered that way in [1] (note the screw holes). --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 20:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know - it seems rather arbitrary to me. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 20:32, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

unreferencedBLP

}} tag. Here is the article:

Brenton Wood - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eastshore Freeway

Eastshore Freeway, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastshore Freeway. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rs chen 7754 20:47, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

File:Santa Clara County Route G2.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Clara County Route G2.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Clara County Route G3.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Clara County Route G3.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Clara County Route G4.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Clara County Route G4.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Clara County Route G5.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Clara County Route G5.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Clara County Route G6.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Clara County Route G6.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Clara County Route G7.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Clara County Route G7.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:06, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Clara County Route G8.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Clara County Route G8.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:08, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Clara County Route G9.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Clara County Route G9.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Clara County Route G10.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Clara County Route G10.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Clara County Route G21.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santa Clara County Route G21.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:12, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Joydawg. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message