User talk:Jungleed
ITN recognition for Umang Gupta
On 26 April 2022,
Vetster moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
May 2022
Hello Jungleed. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jungleed. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jungleed|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:41, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hello there, I am not a paid editor. Please can you remove the tag that you placed?? I cannot believe that I can be accused of such thing without any evidence. Jungleed (talk) 20:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Vetster moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
- Thank you for your message. Could you be a little more specific of the issues? Per guidelines if there is significant news from reliable publications it will qualify. There are several such articles such as:
- https://todaysveterinarybusiness.com/vetster-matches-pet-owners-with-veterinary-advisers/
- https://inbusinessphx.com/growth-enterprise/on-demand-virtual-veterinary-appointments#.YtNvhHJlCUk
- https://thelogic.co/news/telehealth-for-rover-vetsters-growth-fuelled-by-pandemics-telehealth-pet-care-boom/
- https://www.androidheadlines.com/2021/09/vetster-android-app-pets-dogs.html
- https://www.petbusiness.com/industry-news/vetster-launches-online-pet-pharmacy/article_45983fa4-05be-11ec-a256-2b111aed704c.html
- Just some of the articles.
- In addition, another editor tagged the page with a paid editor verbiage. But I am not a paid editor. I am simply a customer of this company and that is how I know about them. I do not have any COI. I have no clue why he thinks I am a paid editor and why someone would do that randomly. Makes no sense to accuse someone without any evidence. Could we please remove that tag? Jungleed (talk) 02:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Jungleed. You're welcome. If you are confident that the sources in the article show that Wikpedia's notability requirements are met, then the are welcome to hit "Submit" so that an independent reviewer can check it. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 00:59, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Vetster (company) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
- You reviewed and approved the page on May 19th, so what has changed???
- Also, why do you keep tagging it that it was created by a paid editor??? I made the page and I am not a paid editor. I do not have COI. I have used their service before and felt they should have page. In addition, the reason I post it again is because they have additional news now and plenty to meet notability.
- I have checked the policies at WP:Conflict of Interest
- "Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to good faith."
- You need to have evidence before you accuse people. You are to assume good faith. Please check Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Jungleed (talk) 18:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Vetster (company)
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
]Your draft article, Draft:Vetster (company)
Hello, Jungleed. It has been over six months since you last edited the
".In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
]