User talk:Junglenut
. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!
Also take care of the following points:
|
|
|
reply
if you are able to enable Rater - you might find a way to work on article talk pages - the evaluation that Rater offers has its limitations, but nevertheless it is a very useful guide.
give it a go! it can be very helpful. JarrahTree 10:12, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Updated deadlinks
Hello Junglenut,
Thanks very much for your painstaking work updating references on plant articles. Much appreciated. Gderrin (talk) 01:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Cheers. I'm on holidays ATM so I have had a lot of time for it. Will be back at work next week and the pace will slow down, but the list is now half the size it used to be :) − Junglenut | talk 03:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Misspellings?
Hello Junglenut,
More thanks from me.
I'm curious about the notes you've added to the articles Dendrobium toressae and Bulbophyllum gracillimum. For D. toressae I think you meant "extra 'r'" (not extra 's') - I changed that to extra 'r'.
I'm confused about the note on B. gracillimum. The ATROK reference is about Cirrhopetalum gracillimum, a synonym of Bulbophyllum gracillimum. Seems to me that the spelling is correct. What do you mean about "(an extra "i")"?
I agree with you about the note you've added to Bulbophyllum lilianae ATROK has misspelled Adelopetalum lilianae. Something's gone wrong with the "references" section though. Gderrin (talk) 06:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ah thanks for heads up on that, the ref list is fixed now.
- The spelling mistakes occur on the ATROK website, not on Wikipedia, and it includes the wrong spelling in the URLs for the factsheets that have been cited in the references. I've been in touch with Frank Zich who heads up the keys projects for rainforest plants (in general) and rainforest orchids, and hopefully they will be corrected on ATROK, at which time the URLs in the references will need to be updated as well. I hope that explains it properly? — Junglenut | talk 07:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- No drama - but I think I must be cross-eyed because I don't see Cirrhopetalum gracilliimum anywhere. And no, I haven't tucked into the red ...not yet anyway. Gderrin (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello Junglenut,
Thanks for your work on this list. I don't know how the earlier stuff got under my radar. There's similar stuff at Elaeocarpus grandis, but maybe eliminating redlinks in the list is more important than fretting over it. (I guess you know that APNI lists all names (like Elaeocarpus baeuerlenii and E. concinnus) whereas the APC only lists accepted names.) All the best to you. Gderrin (talk) 23:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Ficus species, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ficus variegata.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Junglenut. Thank you for your work on
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
Article tagging
Just a comment re Atherton Tableland. You removed a lot of citation-needed tags throughout the article in favour of a tag at the top of the article. Generally, we aim to do the exact opposite, replacing whole-of-article tags with more specific ones in the appropriate places in the article. See Wikipedia:Tagging pages for problems. Specific tags are more likely to attract a fix than whole-of-article tags as people perceive it as easier to do a small fix ("I'm sure I can find a source for that paragraph"). Whole-of-article tagging tends to demotivate people, thinking "gosh, that looks like too much work, it's all too hard, I'll just move on". So if your intention is to encourage people to improve the article, try to tag the specific problems in the specific spots and hope for small improvements. Kerry (talk) 20:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Junglenut. Thank you for your work on
Moss is awesome :) Thanks for writing an article about a plant in the spike moss family.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Clovermoss}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 05:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Clovermoss: Thanks - I have a couple more planned
- Cheers, Steve Junglenut |Talk 09:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Junglenut. Thank you for your work on
Thanks for writing the article! Keep writing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Pittosporum ferrugineum is a lovely page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Piper interruptum is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC) |
CS1 error on Xanthostemon chrysanthus
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Xanthostemon chrysanthus, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
ReferenceExpander
Just a friendly heads-up in case you weren't already aware, since it's installed on your common.js: Careless use of ReferenceExpander has caused serious problems. It's
- @SamX, thanks for that. I've only recently installed it and haven't actually used it yet. Now I think I'll just remove it and carry on as always ;) Junglenut |Talk 05:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)]
Hello, Junglenut,
Just a note that if you create a category and then realize that it's a mistake, you don't need to take it to
- @Liz Thanks. The category only ever had one taxon in it, an article I was working on, and I changed that article once I realised the mistake. I do agree, however, with the suggestion that the existing category be merged into the new one as it matches the title of article about the botanist. Junglenut |Talk 01:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for creating the Cupaniopsis flagelliformis article. Great work! Kiwiz1338 (talk) 08:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC) |
Untitled
FYI junglenut.net is showing a blank page atm. BAPhilp (talk) 23:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- @BAPhilp If you're looking for the information about browser addons, I am no longer maintaining them. The addons for Chrome have been removed as I don't have time to update them. My addons for Firefox can be found here Junglenut |Talk 06:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Aglaia ferruginea, beautiful. The images you uploaded, and the gallery layout, is a model for how a gallery should be done. Thanks! Wikishovel (talk) 09:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC) |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Junglenut. Thank you for your work on
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Junglenut. Thank you for your work on Lepiderema sericolignis. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Dcotos (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Cookbook template location
Hello! I noticed that you moved {{cookbook}} to the bottom of the page on Aleurites moluccanus, citing the template's documentation. I checked the doc, and it doesn't appear to say that the template must be placed in an external links section—rather, it just says that it shouldn't be the sole link in that section. I think it's more helpful to place the template in the relevant article section, where it's more likely to be seen, which is why I've been placing templates there. Cheers! —Kittycataclysm (talk) 12:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Kittycataclysm. In the second sentence in that paragraph, the documentation says to place it "at the top of the last section on the page" rather than creating an external links section just to accomodate the template. As there is already an external links section on the page, and it is the last section on the page, that's where it should go. All templates like this have the same instruction - note the Commons and Wikispecies templates that are in the same section. Having said that, I totally agree with you about noticeability. Cheers, Steve Junglenut |Talk 20:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)