User talk:Juro2351
Welcome
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Wilbysuffolk
Juro2351, good luck, and have fun. --
Disambiguation link notification for September 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1990 in the environment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Correcting vandalism
Hi, Juro! I reverted your edit to Structural formula; although your spelling correction was fine per se, the word concerned had recently been inserted as vandalism, contradicting the rest of the article. When making superficial improvements, please try and verify that what you’re fixing actually makes sense.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 15:59, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Article Feedback deployment
Hey Juro2351; I'm dropping you this note because you've used
Thanks
Thanks for being a vandal fighter.--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
John Carl Buechler
I just stumbled upon the page John Carl Buechler, and it seems you reverted an earlier blanking of the page. While I agree that simple blanking is not a sensible solution, looking over the prose I'd say this isn't an article and I wonder how any of it could even be salvaged to sensibly stubbify the article until it is expanded with proper sources and tone of writing. For that reason, imho simply restoring all the material wasn't a good call either. Just saying since you're one of two established editors to do so, rather than at least acknowledging the unacceptable text itself. --85.197.59.162 (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the helpful tip, I will pay more attention to the reverting. Cheers! Juro2351 (talk) 03:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Juro2351. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)