User talk:KRedstar

Hello, KRedstar, and

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 04:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 04:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for declaring your

• you must provide
  independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines
  . Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
• The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

1. significant coverage in
2. independent,
3. multiple,
4. reliable,
5. secondary sources
   .

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

• you must write in a
  non-promotional
  tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
• there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in
  this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here
  ; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Charles Albert Gorra for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dewritech (talk) 22:16, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KRedstar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dewritech (talk) 22:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 18:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KRedstar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I was blocked for "advertising only". I am not here to advertise our business. I am here to establish our company in a unbiased encyclopedic space where everyone and anyone can learn more about us, like many of our current competitors have done (see The RealReal, Fashionphile, Yoogi's Closet). Initially, the page went up, a few days later, a user flagged it as a G11. However, this action was reversed by another user (not myself) and deemed "not a g11" (I believe it contained most of what it does at this moment). Any edits made after that have been minimal (typically format or grammar) or additional citations and I have been very careful to make the page entirely factual, every sentence has been cited more than once from various reliable sources. The article was then flagged as an orphan, and moved to a draft as a result. To fix this issue, I moved it back to the article space and linked to it from relevant pages, again in no way promoting it, typically only as a "see relevant" or as an example without any promotional language. Others have also made edits to the page, further adding sources. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You say you are not here to advertise your business, and then go on to say how you are here to advertise your business. Wikipedia is not for merely telling about a business, even if you are not actively selling something. Wikipedia summarizes what independent

edit requests. You probably will not be unblocked unless you explain how your future edits will comply with the policies I mention here, and describe what other subjects you are interested in editing about. If you are only here to tell the world about your company, you won't be unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rebag, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, KRedstar. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]