User talk:Kemilliogolgi

Hello, Kemilliogolgi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kemilliogolgi, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kemilliogolgi,

Please do not move around pages multiple times. It gives the appearance that you don't know what you want or what you are doing. It can also be seen as disruptive editing and lead to a loss of editing privileges. Consider whether an article needs to be moved and, if so, move it once. Right now, you have created 7 or 8 redirects that are really unnecessary. Just don't move pages on a whim or without thoughtful consideration.

If you have any questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kemilliogolgi, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 07:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Battle of Merrut
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 21:09, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Maratha invasion of Awadh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mughal and Saadat Ali Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms

that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Durrani Campaign in Meerut
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 18:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mahmud Shah of Jaunpur

added links pointing to Bhojpur, Jaunpur, Mahmudabad and Shahpur

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

More references needed. It is almost in the notable territory, but a few more sources, preferably online, should do it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Gwalior and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 17:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kemilliogolgi, you have been moving draft articles from the AfC process out of the mainspace before they are ready. Your most recent move

Please ensure you are only moving mainspace ready article to the mainspace and not works in progress. Remember, quality over quantity. Thanks, microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 17:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Kampili and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Samalkha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Appears to be original research. Asked on the talk page, author can't identify where else it has been called Jahangir's Mewar campaign by other sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Jahangir's Mewar campaign
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 14:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 13:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Gwalior, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

zoglophie^•talk• 17:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deccan Sultanates-Vijayanagar Conflicts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Venkata.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Talas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. Thank you for your work on

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Mandsaur. Narook (talk) 07:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Narook (talk) 08:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are just as wrong as they are @Narook 70.23.57.138 (talk) 14:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kemilliogolgi You have reverted my edits without giving a suitable explaination.

Can you explain me how History of Mewar from Earliest time to 1751 Ad by R.V Somani is a source from WP: Raj as it was published in 1976. Rawn3012 (talk) 07:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kemilliogolgi Please go to Talk:Conquest of Ajmer and see the discussion there and respond Rawn3012 (talk) 03:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conquest of Mandalgarh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sudsahab (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kemilliogolgi I just noticed that you are adding irrelevant conflicts in this article which occurred in 1202 and nowhere related to Ghaznavids, Now I have to soundly verify each of your additions in the Campaign timeline section as you are adding irrelevant conflicts there so we can't just overlook you and your edits. Sudsahab (talk) 06:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you have cheaked the sources throughly.The source i have added there ,clearly states about the event.And the sources given by me are completely

WP:EDITWAR

.For better assistance I have added the quotation there.Hope it will help you.

Thanks!!! Kemilliogolgi (talk) 06:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. Thank you for your work on

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of battles in Rajasthan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Amar Singh and Mohi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]