User talk:Khan2004kashf

Hello, Khan2004kashf! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 22:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not self promotion. I am not related to the protagonist or the subject in question. I have seen her work and her contribution. And I strongly believe people need to know about her as she has a lot to offer. I am open to taking any guidance from you in achieving the same and upskilling myself in writing/creating non biased and neutral content Khan2004kashf (talk) 23:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You admitted you are her in this edit. Quite contradictory, isn't it? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 00:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I admitted Anusmartmirror and me are same. And I am a male. I can't admit I am her. Who are we talking about? I don't know the person about whom the article I am writing. You want my pictures, adress,phone number? Come and verify. Tired of these allegations. I accepted both profiles are mine but never that I am her Khan2004kashf (talk) 00:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You admitted you are her in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? Well I never admitted I am her. First of all I am a he. And with both accounts of mine I was trying to submit the article on her. From my first account I submitted 3 times. Each time make correction based on the feedback. The first time I was told to add more references. Once, I did that, you told me I am self promoting and its a last warning. Then I removed all the text that appeared not neutral and submitted again. But still you blocked me where are another reviewer passed a different comment. With my new account I posted only once. And in this one there is absolutely no promotion or advertiesement. But still it got rejected and hence, I was looking for help.

Regarding getting my gmail account blocked, it might not make too much sense for you but I am from IT industry and my email ID has all the details for years. I would wan't to get blocked anywhere on that email ID. I hope that makes sense to you.

About my blocks, it says blocked indefinitely. I have made earnest requests, gone through various documentations and would still request to kindly reconsider and help out. This article is not self promotion. If you kindly go through the latest content I had posted, it would be clear to your. There is absolutely no self promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khan2004kashf (talk • contribs) 00:25, May 18, 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Khan2004kashf! I'm CanonNi. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 22:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khan2004kashf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

am sorry but it is not a sock puppet or any illegal, illegitimate attempt. I am new at writing articles In Wikipedia and learning. From your first feedback I made the corrections in my next submit but still got blocked.Also the gmail account I used is years old and I can provide evidence for the same. Hence,I was not sock pocketting as I would want my years old Gmail account to be blocked. :Secondly, I am learning here and correcting with each feedback provided. I was a Lil afraid I lost all the data in the article created. Any guidance and help is greatly appreciated. Thanking you in anticipation Khan2004kashf (talk) 23:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 00:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Your comments are a mixture of nonsense and falsities. Using this account, you submitted the draft only once. It was with your other account that you "re-submitted" it. What does the age of your gmail account have to do with anything? And we cannot "block" your Gmail account. We can disable its use on Wikipedia, which we have not done, but not "block" it.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23, consider revoking TPA? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 00:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khan2004kashf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have gone through the unblock guide. I understand and realise my mistake although an honest mistake. I can assure you it won't happen again. I just need some guidance on the rejections which I will work on over the chat help available Khan2004kashf (talk) 00:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Except that it seems that it did happen again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Continued block evasion as  Confirmed sock, Hubbakhan1983. --Yamla (talk) 12:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]