User talk:Kittymccaffery

Can someone please help me look over my new page for Stephen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hart_Artist and make sure everything is done correctly. Thank to so much.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Krista Allen, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a

BracketBot, Thank you for your help! Appreciate it. KittyMcCaffery (talk) 11:19, 7 July 2014 (EST)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Oliver Trevena may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• XM. Oliver is ambassador for [http://www.notforsalecampaign.org Not For Sale] <ref name="NFS">{{cite web |url=http://www.notforsalecampaign.org</ref> and organization against Human Trafficking.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see

]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Is there a way someone can email me at [email protected] so we can fix these issues? TY

I'll just go ahead and write about it here. It just seems more transparent that way. Wikipedians like transparency.

Wikipedia wants all information that's relevant for people who have articles, even information that might be interpreted as negative. You, on the other hand, have a motivation, admitted or not, to keep that potentially negative information out of the articles you write for clients. That's where your conflict of interest comes in. If you understand about how Wikipedia works, and a surprising number of people don't, you would realize that there's simply no way to guarantee that reliably sourced, negative information will appear, and stay, in the articles you help write, anyways. Heck, there's no way to guarantee that unsourced, negative information will appear, but we try our best to take such information down, particularly of living people. If this information appears, for any length of time, are you going to get the blame for it, even if you're not at fault? Maybe, if somebody doesn't realize how Wikipedia works.

Unfortunately, the best way to go about this is to not write for clients, or other people you are close to personally, or professionally, at all. So, you probably shouldn't, for example, write about your family, either.

The second best way to deal with it is actually the way you dealt with it. Dealing with it transparently, making it very clear that you are being paid as part of your job to do this. In fact, since you are a "paid editor" you are now required to do this, per the terms of use. Traditionally, however, we looks for such disclosures on the articles talk page, but the edit summary should suffice.

If you want more information, you can look

here.I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:47, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, I'm 220 of Borg. Kittymccaffery, thanks for creating Gary Wales (actor)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Main source is a personal website, and IMDB

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

Hi, I'm 220 of Borg. Kittymccaffery, thanks for creating Gary Wales (actor)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Your edit summary: "created page for my client Gary Alexander Wales with his help" Raises some concerns about Wales' notability, but at least you are being open about it. :-) (The connection that is. :-\ )

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

The article Gary Wales (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, imdb lists most roles as "uncredited" or "extra"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 15:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Wales (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Wales (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

You have been tagged as a vandal. Please discuss. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's actually misleading: you haven't been "tagged as a vandal." I believe yours is a promotion-only account and stated as much as the link above, but my request is in process of being turned down, because this is a "noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only." I was told to take my concerns elsewhere, to a different noticeboard, which I don't intend to do. Anyway, I'm sure this is all a bit confusing to you, but you have not been "tagged as a vandal" in any official sense.

talk) 20:51, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

KittyMcCaffery (talk)

Policy requires that you be open about this kind of editing, and what you've done easily satisfies that requirement. Please continue to be careful not to add anything that's in an independent reliable source. You have a narrow path to tread, but it looks like you know how to follow it; please be careful to continue following it properly. Nyttend (talk) 00:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see

Hi. i noticed a request on game of thrones page asking if anyone knew anything about Gary Wales. It would appear that the article you started incorrectly implies he had a starring part in the series, and this has not been corrected despite the problem being pointed out. I would suggest that if you are starting a new article you try to vet it first so that the facts are correct, even if they arent terribly impressive or substantial. If there isnt enough to sound interesting to the general public, then maybe it really isnt enough to justify having a wiki article. Having a striking error is more likely to motivate people here to do something about it than to give it a head start. If you are writing about someone few have ever heard of, then perhaps there is no hurry in posting something containing errors? If you end up in this situation again, then the best thing to do would be urgent action to edit the article in question into a respectable form, addressing objections people have raised, if that is possible. (But I do wish you every success in getting articles started if you can find some respectable facts to pin one around) Sandpiper (talk) 20:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I understand. I am speaking with the wiki people on chat now who are helping me. --Kittymccaffery (talk) 00:25, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Kitty McCaffery talk) 08:24, 31 July 2014 (EST) The article Stephen Hart Artist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:[reply]

No indication of

unverifiable

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Salimfadhley. Kittymccaffery, thanks for creating

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please include coverage from mainstream, reliable sources to help users verify the content of the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Healey (autism activist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Healey (autism activist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 17:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lucylivescot (talk) 23:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kittymccaffery. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Donnie Park (talk) 20:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Donnie, Stephen is a client of mine so I can no longer work on his page. I am fine with the draft being deleted. Thank you. }} --Kittymccaffery (talk) 16:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Kitty McCaffery 06/13/2016 4:14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by KatrinaMcCaffery (talk • contribs) [reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page,

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Healey (autism activist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Healey (autism activist) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Master Cool (talk) 09:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]