User talk:Klee Bakudan

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bennv123 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please cite

notability guidelines

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Centuries Apart (book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bennv123 (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Klee Bakudan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bennv123 (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cult of Reggie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ingenuity was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:43, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Klee Bakudan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What minor edit? I'm not remembering... Klee Bakudan (talk) 18:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Klee_Bakudan - you're marking most of your edits as minor, perhaps accidentally. --Belbury (talk) 18:39, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the edits I'm making are minor, in my opinion. I'm mostly adding small details to movies and video games. They are minor, but maybe they aren't. I don't know, but I'll defer to your judgement here. Klee Bakudan (talk) 20:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I meant to say I'll accept your advice.

(I said "defer to your judgement") Klee Bakudan (talk) 20:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gobonobo were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Article is a copypaste of the Villains Wiki article, and includes no other sources. The images are likely copyright violations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Smile.jpg (Smile Dog) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

gobonobo ^{+ c} 20:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I would like to delete this submission. Klee Bakudan (talk) 23:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What do I do if I'd like to upload a picture to Wikimedia commons, but it isn't mine--like a common picture of a demonic dog? Klee Bakudan (talk) 23:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I have been doing some research into this, and I have successfully (and appropriately) uploaded the photo of the Smile Dog under the release terms of the public domain. I have credited the creator (I think) and noted that I found it off the internet and wish to use it in articles. Thank you, very much. Klee Bakudan (talk) 19:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Klee Bakudan: The images you uploaded have been deleted as copyright violations. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 17:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have again reverted your addition of Smile Dog to List of creepypastas. Villians Wiki (https://villians.fandom.com) is an open wiki and thus not a reliable source. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 18:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Throast. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Halloween Ends, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 22:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you for telling me. Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've readded it and cited my sources

<3 Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The new citation you added does not support Green intending to center the first film around PTSD. Even if it did, it would not fit into that sentence because it describes the different genres of the films (i.e. action and romance). PTSD is not a film genre. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 22:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PTSD is the main undertheme of Halloween (2018)--David Gordon Green stated in the article somewhere that the first film revolved around Laurie's PTSD. I'll check for it; if I can find it I'll add it. Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, it may be true that he chose it as a central theme, but it is still not a genre. Putting it next to two genres would be

WP:ONUS, discuss at talk before restoring. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 22:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I only did one link, and it was one that I think should be in there. There also isn't a lot of links in the plot. Klee Bakudan (talk) 23:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You did two links. You're welcome to raise the matter at the article's Talk page if you wish, but there's nothing wrong with a plot summary with no or minimal links, and no benefit that I can see to linking phrases such as "cadaver" and "having sex" that a reader will generlaly understand without needing an expository link. DonIago (talk) 04:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi~

NahidasWorld (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Klee Bakudan (talk) 16:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to M3GAN, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Umbrella man (JFK assassination), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Klee Bakudan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Umbrella man (JFK assassination) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Either you didn't read

you didn't understand it. I strongly suggest that you do not mark any edits as minor. You'll never go wrong doing that, and it will avoid creating problem edits. Sundayclose (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Alright, thank you. I've read WP:MINOR and it's been helpful, and I'm understanding it. I understand what I need to do--thanks for the advice with not marking any edits as minor. Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Klee Bakudan. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It had already been deleted I assumed; thanks for the reminder. Klee Bakudan (talk) 19:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Go ahead, you may delete it. Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Klee Bakudan. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's entirely inappropriate to change something in an article to your preference at the same time that you start a discussion about the change on the article's talk page. Wait until the issue is resolved before making any changes in the article. Sundayclose (talk) 22:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pet Sematary (1989 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've basically reverted this edit as the citation makes no sense and The Worst Movie Ever! only bested the worst premiere record. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, you made this edit, and it requires a reliable source. You've done that several times. Consider this a level three warning. Sundayclose (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose um, I'm a different user giving a different warning. Consider this a level 2000 trout. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I misread. But the level three warning for Klee Bakudan stands. Sundayclose (talk) 22:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why though? they haven't made any more offending edits since you warned. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because there is a previous level two warning for unsourced edits, as well as several other warnings. Sundayclose (talk) 22:51, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Klee Bakudan. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]