User talk:Klodde

Welcome!

Hello, Klodde, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

I reverted your addition to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 2 The files do not appear to be on this wiki and if they did a deletion request should have been filed on the entry for the current day not backdated. Maybe you had a different wiki in mind. Agathoclea (talk) 09:59, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Eurovision!
	You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Eurovision. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project. We offer a place for you to connect with users who also like Eurovision and facilitate team work in the development of Eurovision articles.
	If you decide to join the project, please add your name to watchlist .
	I hope you accept! - CT Cooper · talk

Hi! I agree that 2010 population numbers should be used. I don't know enough about how the Belgian city templates work however. I think you should bring up the issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Belgium, I'm sure the people there will know how to fix things. Good luck! AxelBoldt (talk) 21:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i do it! المتمرد (talk) 04:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I award Klodde this barnstar for contributing a large body of content on Belgium localities that were previously missing from the English Wikipedia. CT Cooper · talk 16:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

Because even the league they are in does not have its own article. I was unsure if a club could be notable if its league is not notable. Plus I am unsure if the team is eligible to play in the Belgian FA's highest cup competition. Are there many other teams at their level with articles? Del_♉sion23 (talk) 01:07, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article FC Mere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a Belgian club which never played above

WP:FOOTYN

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Kosm1fent 15:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article SK Aaigem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a Belgian club which never played above

WP:FOOTYN

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Kosm1fent 15:19, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article KVC Erpe Erondegem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a Belgian club which never played above

WP:FOOTYN

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Kosm1fent 15:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article FC Oranja Erpe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a Belgian club which never played above

WP:FOOTYN

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Kosm1fent 15:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article FC Edixvelde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a Belgian club which never played above

WP:FOOTYN

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Kosm1fent 15:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SK Aaigem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SK Aaigem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Kosm1fent 17:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a proposal to

Just so you know, all the articles have been userfied, so you are free to continue working on them now for as long as you need, and they now won't be deleted unless they are left abandoned for a long period. Best of luck.

CT Cooper · talk 18:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]