User talk:Kworbi

On the Evan Peters page, it's locked (or just not working for me) but the part with his relationship with Emma Roberts needs updated because (unfortunately) they got back together a few months later (Aug I think, but you can find articles) where they're "taking things slow". They also got engaged originally Christmas 2013, not included. You were the last to edit & since I've never done it & not working, it's why I'm sending it to you. Thanks!

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your change to

Wikipedia relies on reliable sources; we cannot change information in articles in such a way that it contradicts sources. Artists like Taylor Swift, Katy Perry and Rihanna are not on the list.

Please do not introduce information to the article that does not conform to the source. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Actually, Taylor is on there - she has 24.5 certified units by the RIAA. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:03, 9 June 2015 (UTC))[reply]

First, sorry for my english because i'm french ! So, even if i don't post the references, I promise what i say about The Pinkprint Tour in Nîmes is true ! It's just France News doesn't talk about that, but you can see some messages on music website that talk about the medley : http://www.chartsinfrance.net/communaute/index.php?/topic/54120-nicki-minaj-the-pink-print-tour/page-19#entry3685569 You can also found videos that show the medley on Youtube or Energy Of Music VK I don't to be consider as a liar ^_^ Thank you !!! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Super.Chopper-Man (talk • contribs) 18:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Queen of the Clouds Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at American Horror Story: Hotel. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article
  dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's
  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  .

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You are neither new in Wikipedia, nor a good faith user, the long list of warnings in your talk page is proof enough. Just stop editing here altogether and learn policies first. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Since you've started an edit war in the

The European boxscores I edit in The Pinkprint Tour page, have been reported by Pollstar. Here is a link to a website that confirms that the attendances and revenue are true[1] JonathanMinaj2 (talk) 21:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the American Horror Story: Hotel page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kworbi reported by User:IndianBio (Result: ). Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at American Horror Story: Hotel. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned a billion times your edits are erroneous, yet you continue to blatantly revert. I will be reporting you to the board and we'll finally be rid of this lunacy. LLArrow (talk) 06:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:LLArrow Okay, and when you do, I'll be sure to mention how you revert all of my edits without a reason, while I support my edits with multiple reason why I made the change. I don't understand why you think reverting my edits without a reason is an offense on my part, but I think they will see otherwise. -- Kworbi

You have no place on Wikipedia. You refuse to learn how to use it properly and force your

opinion on to every article you edit. I have given you multiple explanations of why your edits at AHS: Hotel have been reverted, yet you still claim ignorance and accuse others. I'm done with you. LLArrow (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

That is not true whatsoever. I provide proof to all of my edits, and you know that. Also, you haven't given any reasons why you reverted my edits. All you do is insult me, so don't say you give valid reasons. --- User:Kworbi

If you think any of what I have said to you is insulting, you must be new here. Learn how to sign your freaking comments already! With four tildes, it's so simple. LLArrow (talk) 21:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LLArrow (talk) 18:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up your disruptive editing and I'm reporting you, again, to the admins. Learn how to use Wikipedia already, and stop enforcing your opinion. LLArrow (talk) 23:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up what? My last edit was removing episode numbers from the character section. That is what you wanted, so I'm helping enforce it. You're making absolutely no sense. If you'd like to explain what you're ranting about, I'd be glad to listen. Thanks! :) ---- User:Kworbi

Oh cut the crap, you know exactly what I'm referring to. You obviously have ZERO knowledge of how actors are credited in television series, because if you did you would know the reason why the category of Guest stars and Recurring are two completely desperate things that have nothing to do with each other. Stop transcluding them into one big category like an idiot. Only edit when you know what you're doing please. Obviously that's never since you still haven't learned to sign your damn comments. LLArrow (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you watch the episodes closely or not? It clearly states at the beginning of each episode "Special Guest Stars" followed by "Guest Stars". Even if they do occur in more than one episode, they're stil guest starring. I clearly know what I'm doing since multiple other members agree with me on this situation, but nice try. I suggest taking a chill pill as well because you don't need to get all nasty when, might I add barely, explaining something. ---- User:Kworbi

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Queen of the Clouds Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen of the Clouds Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hello, Kworbi. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading