User talk:Kyleung05

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sue Monroe, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:32, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I noticed your edits at

@Kyleung05: still awaiting your reply on this. Ignoring talk page messages is exactly what Carmena Seoul et al. did. Wallnot (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyleung05: Wallnot (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You continue to replace numbers that are correctly formatted with incorrect versions. Please stop. - Special-T (talk) 12:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing "first lady" and "second lady" from caps to no caps (or vice-versa). A very high percentage of your edits have to be reverted or cleaned up by other editors because you are changing the content to be incorrect. - Special-T (talk) 17:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 19:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to George W. Bush, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wallnot (talk) 01:48, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is an ANI report going to be required? Stop making big changes across several bios, without a consensus. GoodDay (talk) 15:13, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also your refusal to communicate with other editors (i.e acknowledge them), is highly problematic. GoodDay (talk) 15:21, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been asked to make a case at talk, rather than making huge numbers of small changes. Please stop now, or I will take you to ANI. Slatersteven (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 15:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Biden. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wallnot (talk) 20:36, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks!

Again, please provide an edit summary each time you make an edit. Failing to do so forces other editors to look at the diff of your edits to determine what you are doing and risks being misunderstood. Wallnot (talk) 22:50, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at George W. Bush, you may be blocked from editing. Wallnot (talk) 23:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flexity Outlook (Toronto). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Echoedmyron (talk) 00:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 15:47, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Please stop adding Twitter links to various pages that already have their main websites linked. Per

WP:ELOFFICIAL an article subject can only have 1 official link. The social media are linked from their main sites so only the main site is needed. Canterbury Tail talk 23:09, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

See alsos

Additionally please stop removing See alsos from the relevant sections and dumping them all at the bottom of the article. The See also template is used to keep some see also close to the relevant sections where they are more useful for the readers. You've been reverted on this across the project on multiple occasions now and your edits are

disruptive. I see your page is currently full of disruptive editing warnings and you've obviously read the appropriate policies and links that you've been pointed to repeated. So if you do not stop your disruptive edits and engage on talk pages, you will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 23:14, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 19:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Toronto Rocket, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Echoedmyron (talk) 23:31, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wallnot (talk) 00:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

For continuing to make disruptive edits like this

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 11:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will be kind. Kyleung05 (talk) 21:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry from editing. Kyleung05 (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gal Gadot, you may be blocked from editing. Stop adding filmography categories to actor biography articles. These are not filmographies. Wallnot (talk) 23:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final ever warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 18:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you expired? Kyleung05 (talk) 18:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Since you are continuing your pattern of disruptive editing after your last and final warning, and you show absolutely no interest in engaging with the community or altering your behaviour in any way, you've left me with no choice but to block you for the good of the project to prevent further disruption.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 21:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I edit? Kyleung05 (talk) 17:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to request an unblock, the instructions are in the block notice above. Canterbury Tail talk 18:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When will blocked from editing be over? Kyleung05 (talk) 23:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are currently blocked indefinitely. If you wish to edit again you need to make an unblock request as detailed in the instructions above and an admin will review it. Canterbury Tail talk 01:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you expire this block? Kyleung05 (talk) 10:51, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]