User talk:Kyodaiteeter

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije (talk) 23:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electricity Generation from Underutilized Energy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electricity Generation from Underutilized Energy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tchaliburton (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoya-Boya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoya-Boya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

]

Proposed deletion of Obachan in Osaka

The article Obachan in Osaka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopaedic content / incoherent / probably a coathat. Agree with CSD: a group of "forty seven women over fifty in Osaka" unfixable mess

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The reformation of entrance exams for unviersities for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mike1901 (talk) 08:50, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Arjayay (talk) 08:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mike1901 (talk) 08:59, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Issues with smartphone use is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Issues with smartphone use until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. slakr^\ talk / 09:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kyodaiteeter,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Overuse of electronic devices for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Overuse of electronic.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:56, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kyodaiteeter,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wo Sukuu(Mamoru) Kai for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Wo sukuu kai.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:02, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kyodaiteeter,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether World Cup Surprise should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Cup Surprise .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 10:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wo sukuu kai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Essay consisting primarily of original research

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

]

Proposed deletion of Kyoto University Mudslide in Japan

The article Kyoto University Mudslide in Japan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a haphazard collection of details about various events with no obvious connection to Kyoto University.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

Thanks for your contribution to the

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wo sukuu kai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wo sukuu kai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DAJF (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ultimate in Japan

added links pointing to Maplewood and Columbia High School

Kyoyasai

added a link pointing to Basin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bocchi (Japanese) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bocchi (Japanese) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Mfield (Oi!) 05:11, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have been blocked temporarily from editing as your continual creation of articles that don't meet our

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University clubs in Japan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University clubs in Japan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've been reading the articles that you have been writing for Wikipedia. There are some very interesting topics there. Unfortunately, they are not suitable for Wikipedia so many of them are being deleted. I am an Australian living in Kobe. What topics are you interested in? If we work together I think we can make some good articles that will not be deleted. I can read and write Japanese too, so I think we can make a good team. Have a good day! AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 22:59, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kyodaiteeter. I noticed the comment you left on Athomeinkobe's Talk page, which implies you are a teacher uploading your students' work to Wikipedia in the form of new articles. Apart from the fact that this is causing extensive work for other editors who have to subsequently review and clean up the poor quality articles, this more importantly constitutes a rather serious copyright problem. If you are not the author or creator of the material you are uploading, then this is a copyright violation, and you need to stop immediately. If you are teaching students and you are encouraging them to create material for Wikipedia, you should first read the guidelines at Wikipedia:Student assignments thoroughly yourself, get your students to make sure they also fully understand the guidelines and Wikipedia policies, and then get them to create their own individual accounts and upload the material themselves. While I can understand that Wikipedia may seem like a great way to get students to practise their English in public, that's not what Wikipedia is intended for, and if they are Japanese natives, they may be able to contribute more constructively on the Japanese language Wikipedia. Sorry to sound harsh, but feel free to drop me a line if you still have any questions. --DAJF (talk) 03:27, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you DAJF and forgive the belated response. I will keep this in mind and I will no longer upload their articles. This is the first time I have done this, and I have learned quite a bit. Had not realize there was a Student assignments wiki. Sandbox looks like the way to go. Forgive the troubles caused and will be more careful in the future. What is interesting is that some of the topics that are on Japanese Wikipedia are not considered valuable on the English Wikipedia. This is hard for me to comprehend. Also, I am not sure why non-English sources are considered unreliable, especially when the information is often a primary source or is more detailed and actually more reliable. I feel that some of the judgement of some the others editors in this matter is a bit hasty and biased Kyodaiteeter (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kyodaiteeter,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Shukko should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shukko .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks, Imaginatorium (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article PC remote control incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be student essay cobbled together from lots of news articles in Japanese. The author clearly admits articles of this type were just uploaded student essays See: [1].

Not sure why the above comment is relevant. This was an important incident in Japan, and the comment re: the students work is quite uncalled forKyodaiteeter (talk) 06:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Botchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Botchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yea, I expect dis kind of behaviour from Ryulong — Preceding unsigned comment added by But I wont stop! (talk • contribs) 16:56, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

The article Shimanekko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this topic passes

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the