User talk:Lampsalot

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Tiramisoo (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hello, Lampsalot, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions

. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
How to write a great article
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

sign your name

on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

BOVINEBOY2008 11:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Work Smart

Greetings. Please look at

WP:RS. Blogs are not reliable sources. cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 01:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

American nationalism

Hi Lampsalot, thanks for your recent edits on

reliable sources

and let's talk about it in a way that is referenced, precise and hopefully educational :) Thanks,

-- Joren (talk) 04:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Communal anarchy

I have nominated Communal anarchy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communal anarchy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:People with Aspergers

renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 02:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop adding inapropriate categories to articles

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to David Byrne and Albert Einstein twice each ([1], [2], [3], [4]), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 19:26, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scene

Hi. I have redirected

WP:RS

. You can also see some of the previous deletion discussions at the following links:

As you can see, "scene" as a topic for Wikipedia has been roundly rejected a number of times due to insufficient sources existing. Before creating yet another "scene" article, please try gathering sources that meet the criteria of

WP:RS, making a draft in userspace, and submitting it to Wikipedia:Articles for creation for review first. --IllaZilla (talk) 04:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been

illegitimate

reasons is not.
If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 08:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zero world government for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zero world government is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero world government until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 20:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zero world government for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zero world government is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero world government (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 14:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]