speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with
Lawdex . If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{
hangon }} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's
talk page . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.
hbdragon88 04:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hello, and
Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that
Lawdex meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.
Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawdex . Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.
Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, an administrator will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article.
What is needed, judging from the AFD so far: first, any articles in independent news sources, and second, any independent report that shows market share. DGG 05:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please stop adding that link without explanation of your edit either on the article's Talk page or at least in an edit summary. The addition of the link without some explanation or context makes it appear to be a spam-link. Continued addition of the link without discussion is rapidly starting to look like a bad-faith edit. Rossami (talk) 18:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot . I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dietrech J. Pessin , a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
Userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
WP:REFUND/G13
.
Thank you for your attention.
talk) 01:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hello, Lawlalaw. It has been over six months since you last edited your
".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace
.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at
WP:REFUND/G13,
or 2) copy this code:
{{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Dietrech J. Pessin}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.
talk) 02:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
[ reply ]