User talk:LaylaDakota

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome

Hello, LaylaDakota, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 20:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at
Ben Jones (boxer)
(November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 20:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, LaylaDakota! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 20:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Ben Jones (boxer)
(July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
HighKing++ 11:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at
Ben Jones (boxer)
(August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sahaib3005 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
talk) 15:13, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at
Ben Jones (boxer)
(September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 21:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi LaylaDakota! The thread you created at the

archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread
.


The archival was done by
Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both

talk) 19:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Jones (boxer) has been accepted

Ben Jones (boxer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RhyDizel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RhyDizel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RhyDizel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LaylaDakota

Im not sure how this outcome has been reached? i understand about the press articles being used and these have been removed and will be replaced with more notable and beneficial links. Thanks! LaylaDakota (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, where do I start? The Billboard source doesn't even mention him. Not only is he not notable but the information is completely unverifiable. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:39, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 08:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 08:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

I would also recommend learning to edit existing articles before jumping into article creation, and most editors would as well. It's extremely hard to make articles, and this way you don't risk your work being deleted. Once you get a grasp on how things work, you can give it another shot; alternatively, you can attempt the drafts, but it will not be easy. Ifsyou have any further questions, please leave me a message at my talk page, which is the best way to reach me; I will try to help to the best of my ability, because I do really want to see Wikipedia succeed. pan style="background-color: black">Skarmory (talk • contribs) 08:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dylan Bostic (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wgullyn was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
>>> 
talk(); 22:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]