User talk:Lijnema

Welcome!

Hello, Lijnema, and

to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

 ~ clearthought 21:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Lijnema 11:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lijnema, I notice you deleted warrock from the list, could you add a reason for the deletion to the

]

Done. --Lijnema 22:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

How would you be able to provide those? Upload to an FTP or something? If you need, I can provide a location. --TIB (talk) 00:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about the actual files? Because, just so you know, we're talking about 1.2GB there. I could upload them somewhere, but you can also get them from http://broadcast.sexy-admin.de/library/2 as torrents. Same place also has the track listings (just click on the album pictures, or names. --Lijnema 11:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Zombie Plan page is just a fun page. It's for me and a few friends to disclose our thoughts about the threat of zombies and stuff. Also the page with be an ongoing page and won't be complete for some time. So please don't delete the page! AfraidOfUndead 02:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I won't do any deleting per se, I'm just putting the tag there so someone else will. As much as fun pages are fun to have, Wikipedia isn't really the place for it. Perhaps you could put up a webpage on Google pages/Geocities/etc, or make a forum about zombies and how to beat them. I'm sure there are loads of fun things you write about zombies with your friends, but this isn't really the place to do it. You could perhaps even write a bit about zombie defence on your own userpage, I don't think anyone would complain about that (as long as you realise that Wikipedia isn't a webhost of course ;). --Lijnema 02:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user seems to be playing stupid games. I've reported h(im|er) on the vandal board, so an admin will see the article anyway. Thanks for the help though. Seraphimblade 21:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okelidokeli. --Lijnema 21:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to avoid reverting non-vandalous edits using popups (like removal of speedy tags) because it might cause you to miss test edits/vandalism that also need reverting :-( Miltopia 00:51, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted that article just to get back my speedy deletion tag, which had been removed. I didn't really feel like cleaning up an article I felt needed speedy deleting anyway. :) --Lijnema 00:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:-O Good point. You win this round! Miltopia 04:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for your helpful suggestions! I'm quite new to this and still learning (hopefully). I keep getting very annoyed with everyone using wikipedia as a medium to promote themselves, their band, product etc. Again, thanks for you suggestions. All the best, Kon-Tiki001 13:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for warning Lxguy. I was on it and you just seemed to be a little faster than me. :) --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 15:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I try to warn/inform (depending on the situation) someone when I've reverted or added AfD/speedy tags because of their edits. :) --Lijnema 15:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'Course. As we should all be doing. :) --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 15:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry lijnema about the ron saario thing. i was only intedning to build a better wikipedia article about leota junior high --— Preceding unsigned comment added by N734LQ (talk • contribs)

That's okay. So am I. I just didn't think this Ronald Saario was notable enough. --Lijnema 21:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thats okay. can you help me delete it?N734LQ 21:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the page to be deleted you can remove the {{tl:hangon}} from the article page, letting the admins know that you're not opposing the deletion. And perhaps also writing something to that effect on Talk:Ronald Saario, saying that you don't mind if it gets deleted. Don't feel to bad about it, we all make mistakes, and there are a lot of guidelines for what there should and shouldn't be articles about on Wikipedia. And if someone posts a mean message in response to you, or on your talk page, just stay calm :) --Lijnema 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

can do. how do i sign up to become and admin. i feel i have the proper qualifications, and have shown that by not getting vandalism warnings. can you help?N734LQ 21:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you can nominate yourself and others at

WP:RFA. But I am guessing that first of all you'd need to be around for quite a while longer, and probably also be able to find answers to questions like that on your own. ;) --Lijnema 22:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

lijnema:thank you for your help. i'd like to retain you as a help source. you seem like a nice person to me, and a a caring one at that. i thank you for your help for advising me not to become and admin yet. i really didnt have proper qualifications quite yet. well see 'ya round, eh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by N734LQ (talk • contribs)

Okay, good luck. --Lijnema 22:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed that tag - like you said above "If you want the page to be deleted you can remove the {{tl:hangon}} from the article page". I hope this issues has been resolved. Sorry i couldnt reply to you sooner. Dep. Garcia ^{(Talk to Me)} 16:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, wont happen again! Dep. Garcia ^{(Talk to Me)} 16:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hej på dig. I blocked this user indef as it is clear that it's a spam-only account. User pages usually go to

]

user_talk:klondike151 I'm not sure what else you wanted in Zeal_(WoW_guild). Do you need more proof that it exists? More references? Links to web articles that cite it? I felt my article was verifiable (that the group exists) by my external links and that it was as neutral as can be regarding a large group's feelings/thougts. Any more help to make my article more 'noteable' would be appreciated.

Just because something exists doesn't mean it should be on Wikipedia. Also, the article (or perhaps a comment of yours on the talk page) said the guild was over a hundred members large, that sounds quite small to me. Anyway I found

guidelines for clubs and similar, which say that "The club, society, or organization has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the club, society, or organization itself." That means blog posts, forum posts, more or less all personal webpages and so on don't count. --Lijnema 11:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

You deleted Adcott's binary transalator! Can't believe you. Did you even go to the discussion page of the Adcott's binary transalator? GAWD! AstroBoy 04:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete it, I put a speedy deletion tag on it, and I even replied on the talk page about it. And then someone who can delete pages came along and decided to delete it. I maintain that it clearly didn't pass

WP:WEB. --Lijnema 16:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

You didn't delete the Adcott's Binary Transalator page did you? someone else did. Who? AstroBoy 01:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see in the deletion log, it was Alphachimp. --Lijnema 11:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That was actually quite a sweet and considerate gesture on your part. Honestly! ;)--Huaiwei 16:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can't delete

) .

Chief Ministers of NWFP?

Much of my Wikipedia work is on categorisation of uncategorised pages, so today I found the chief ministers page and upgraded it a bit before finding the controversy. Sorry if this is causing problems (especially because moving the article seems to have disrupted the talk page, and I don't know how to find it again!) Nyttend 21:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it'll be fine. But thanks for the message! :) --Lijnema 22:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't confuse this issue by giving out inappropriate vandalism warnings. Removing sourced information is bad, but it's not blanking, or any other type of vandalism. Blanking is removing the whole page, or replacing it with nonsense, out of malice. You'll find "NPOV violations" under "What vandalism is not" on

]

• The creator blanked it.
  Danny Lilithborne 23:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I edited it during AVB's reversion, and for some reason I didn't get an edit conflict. But the author blanking the page can be taken as his request to remove the page, so there's no real harm in leaving it blank.
    Danny Lilithborne 23:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Thanks for that. Tonywalton  | Talk 13:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

np :) --Lijnema 14:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD was a particularly messy one. I got rid of all the links - they were more than I expected. I afraid that you'll have to nominate

]

To Lijnema: Thanks for clearing up the ATF spam on those dab pages too. Richard W.M. Jones 16:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page is at User:Lijnema/Night Sun. Good luck with your cleanup / proof of notability, and happy editing! Kusma (討論) 22:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To Lijnema: I can't argue with the deletion template according to your edit. I searched for any valid publications that mention the company with no luck. Besides self-advertising as a Vendor on the ILTA page and various Law-tech publications, I can't find any criteria that coincides with the suggested standards. I'll have to hold off adding until I can find something valid in the future. I won't re-add it until then. Sorry for the trouble. It was my first add and I hadn't read up on the policies initially. Should I blank the page or just leave your template as is? - Oldmanriddle 18:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why remove the Paul Morley quote?!? —The preceding

]

Whoa. That must have been a mistake. Really sorry about that, I've re-added it. But I'm a bit miffed at how I removed them without noticing. :/ Thanks for bringing it up though. --Lijnema 18:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, these things happen...was just curious, it didn't look malicious. Orbtastic 18:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This person has just removed another tag. I am not gonna report them, I will leave that to you, as I think you were hasty to jump to a last warning. Thanks. J Milburn 23:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• From Scott Spangler, should have mentioned that. J Milburn 23:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you that it is pointless vandalism, I am just a big believer in procedure. Happy editing! J Milburn 16:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Camila Janniger is a full professor on my voluntary faculty at the New Jersey Medical School. She has far superior credentials than many other physicians listed on Wikipedia. She has written 34 book chapters and 143 full articles. You can verify most of her full articles using pubmed, which using Janniger CK gives 133. Please reinsert her into Wikipedia and delete the Camila Janniger nonsense section on your talk page.

2002–present Clinical Professor, Dermatology; Clinical Associate Professor, Pediatrics; Chief, Pediatric Dermatology, UMDNJ—New Jersey Medical School

Honors & Awards

Multiple Dean's prizes (monetary awards) for academic excellence, Medical Academy of Warsaw Charter Member, Sigma Xi Scientific Research Society, New Jersey Medical School Chapter Fellow, American Academy of Dermatology Member, National Tuberous Sclerosis Association Professional Advisory Board (1993-1996) Who’s Who in Medicine and Healthcare (1st edition, 1997-1998)

Editorial Activities

Member, Editorial Board, Cutis (1991-present) Co-editor, Cutis, Special Issues, World Congress (1992) and Pediatric Dermatology (1996) Founding Pediatric Dermatology Editor, Cutis (1992-present) Member, Scientific Committee (International Editorial Advisory Board), Mikologia Lekarska Medical Mycology (Wroclaw) (1997-present) Managing Editor, eMedicine Dermatology (2006-present) Member, Editorial Board, Dermatologia Kliniczna (Wroclaw), (2005-present) Member, Editorial Board, SKINMed (2007-present)

Dr. Janniger is someone of the highest ethical standards.

Robert A. Schwartz MD, MPH, FAAD, FACP ([email protected]) Professor and Head, Dermatology New Jersey Medical School —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hipwero (talk • contribs).

Hello Mr. Robert A. Schwartz MD, MPH, FAAD, FACP. In short: No, I'm not going to remove it. I am a bit annoyed that you have the nerve to almost demand that I should be part of recreating a deleted article about her, and not only that but also remove parts of my talk page about her bad behaviour. I have to admit I can't be totally sure about this, but as I remember it that bit on my talk page is there because she was doing two no-nos, namely writing about herself, and recreating deleted pages. So I don't really care how many books she's published, articles she's written, or how fond she is of acronyms (same goes for you), the page was rightfully deleted at that point, and she was doing things she shouldn't have been doing.

If you have a nice list of why there should be an article about her, go ahead with your deletion review, and please believe me when I say that I do wish you luck with it, but please, please don't bother me about it. --Lijnema 21:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 05:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nevertrustoriginality.jpg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 21:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Image licensing

Why are you removing the licensing tag from File:Kleptones, updown cover.jpg? Remember that images need to have a licensing tag; the non-free use rationale only explains the circumstances in which we can use our non-free images. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I got the impression that it was a template used when a non-free rationale wasn't present yet, since it included text asking the uploader to add such a rationale. I'm sorry for the mistaken removal. --Lijnema (talk) 11:48, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]