Thanks for the vote of confidence on the Village Pump. Unfortunately, the B-Movie Bandit template has been nominated by another user for deletion. The B-Movie Bandit is killing me, I tell ya. - Lucky 6.9 06:33, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I voted to keep it. --TIB 06:38, Aug 15, 2004 (UTC)
There
Stating the thing about the patches is ok, but we shouldn't try to compromise or displease vandals in an encyclopedic article. [[User:Supadawg|supadawg - Talk]] 18:00, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
minor edits when they should be marked as regular edits. Don't be so hard on yourself, people who are watching the page want to see your edits too. Go ahead and mark them as major when you add content. - Mescad
(recovering minor-edit addict)
I have them auto mark as minor edits. Most of mine are pretty minor. Sometimes I make a major and forget to change it. I've been trying to get out of that habit lately, but sometimes I slip. --TIB(talk) 02:51, Aug 29, 2004 (UTC) (Recovering boredom addict)
Hi.. I replaced the second image in the World of Warcraft article with that new screenshot, I think it looks much better now. Nice one! —Stormie 07:03, Sep 5, 2004 (UTC)
WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000
Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at
Template messages/User namespace
. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the
GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
I've answered your comment on my talk page. – Ram-Man(comment) (talk)[[]] 14:20, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)
Nice picture, TIB. It fits well with the article. I never bothered with the internet connection myself - it is interesting to see all the stuff that was needed to make it work. Are you still into handheld gaming? I am knee-deep in Advance Wars: Dual Strike on the DS right now. That and the PSP's new web browser and the promise of Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories has me pretty excited. -Armaced 17:29, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
gamecom is the newest portable player i own but if GTA:LCS is as good as it's cracked up to be, it's PSP time. --TIB(talk) 19:39, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:RichardKyanka-PressPhoto.jpg
Thanks for uploading
copyright tag
, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for helping with the Kelly Clarkson song article--Hotei59 20:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Moral Character article
I'm very sorry if I upset you. I appologize. I was RC patroling for
vandalism
and came across the edit. It looked to me to be blanking.
From WP:VAND:
Blanking
Removing all or significant parts of articles (sometimes replacing the removed content with profanities) is a common vandal edit.
In trying to maintain
NPOV, I was not comparing the bulk of the article to my moral compass or judging it in any way, shape or form. Is it not suspicious when an anon editor removes a large chunk of an article and all the edit summary says is "Garbage"? Sorry for the inconvenience. thadius856talk 09:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Image:RichardKyanka-PressPhoto.jpg
Thanks for uploading
first fair use criterion
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok☠ 18:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed Deletion:
Therebucks
Therebucks
I've added the "{{
Therebucks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Therebucks. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Torinir( Ding my phoneMy support callsE-Support Options ) 01:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Goon's affliction
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Goon's affliction page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki 18:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Edit Summary
dood, you won 'the_undertow award for best edit summary of the day'
---> sometimes i tell myself I'll preview first. I never do. —The preceding
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image source problem with Image:Dangerfield.1997.ap.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dangerfield.1997.ap.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
48 hours after 05:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply