User talk:Liz617

Hello, Liz617, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Guillaume2303 (talk) 09:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply ] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Thanks for the

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Sociological Quarterly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of St. Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Human development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tolerance and Diversity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to me that you are engaged in editing with a conflict of interest on behalf of Wiley, as all the articles you have been writing a Wiley journals. I don;t think your editing is necessarily improper, but I do need to caution you about our rules. The page that best expresses our current policy is the WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, which advises you in strong terms to use to Articles for Creation process. However, you seem to be editing in general in an appropriate manner, and there is no absolute requirement to use the AfC process. (In fact, the AfC process is currently in a state of great inconsistency, as anyone can review an article, whether or not they do it competently). So, although as an administrator with an great interest in the subject of academic journals, I must make you aware of what the current practice, I would also advise you that you are safe in continuing to write directly, and probably should continue to do that. (If challenged, let me know).

I say this because, as far as I can tell, they are appropriate subjects for articles meeting our normal notability requirements. , but I think you may be unduly copying the usually routine statement of interest from the journal web site; usually the scope of the journal is self explanatory, but the alternatives are to rewrite it in a different way, or if no such way is possible, to quote it with a reference.

There are one or two other points. Since , according to WP:PROF, being the editor in chief of an academic journal is proof of notability, it would be very helpful if you would list the successive editors in chief, as well as the present one. (only editors in chief, not editorial board). It's also good practice to give their academic affiliation. We normally list only major indexes, not all of them--that kind of list is for the journal website. And you seem to be using some 2011 impact factors--could you please update them to 2012.

You may want to consult our guide at Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide, and consider participating.

And, of course, if you really want to help in a way that will deflect any possibly unfriendly comments about conflict of interest, perhaps it would be good to also write articles about some other journals in the same general areas. If you need any assistance, please ask me directly on my user talk page. -- I'm unlikely to see any questions posted elsewhere. DGG ( talk ) 02:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree completely with DGG's advice. In particular, I would appreciate if you could read the
  WP:NJournals). The stubs that you are creating risk to be proposed for deletion in their current state. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 15:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello, Liz617. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current