User talk:Llamalover123

Please do not delete sections of text or valid links from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Llama. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Fan-1967 17:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Femto 17:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nintendo was changed by Llamalover123 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-10-23T18:54:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 18:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Black Spruce was changed by Llamalover123 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-10-23T19:33:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 19:34, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Llama, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Llama was changed by Llamalover123 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-10-23T19:35:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 19:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Spruce, you will be blocked from editing. --Blind Eagle^{talk~contribs} 19:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Llamalover123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's unfair!

Decline reason:

No it's not, you were warned. Mango juice^talk 14:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.