User talk:M3ATH

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, Moazfargal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Bremps... 22:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished editing the article with your suggestions, could you check it out? — 

talk) 00:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

BLPCRIME

Hi, I'd like to draw your attention to

WP:BLPCRIME, our policy that strongly discourages naming/identifying living people accused of a crime unless they have been proven guilty in a court of law. In future GA discussions about such articles as Killing of Wadea al-Fayoume, it would be great if you could make sure that these articles do not violate this policy. Cheers,kashmīrī TALK 18:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Oh, sorry for not taking care of that in the review. What's the appropriate course of action now that the article is a GA? —M3ATH (
Talk) 18:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Ok now I see you've made the necessary edits to the article. Thank you. —M3ATH (
Talk) 18:58, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the

contentious
. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have

Ctopics/aware
}} template.

Regarding this, I’ve noticed you’ve been making a lot of edits in this topic area. Please note that the restriction applies even if the page is not protected. BilledMammal (talk) 11:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The restriction does apply to unprotected pages, but not to extended confirmed users. —M3ATH (See · Say) 11:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for mentioning that you have the extended-confirmed user right. It's easy to just look at edit count and gloss over the user rights. —C.Fred (talk) 11:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 13:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Your GA nomination of Mohammed Deif

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 22:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Your GA nomination of Mohammed Deif

The article Mohammed Deif you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mohammed Deif for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jenin refugee camp GAN

Hello, I see that you've nominated Jenin refugee camp as a GAN, but you've been less active since the nomination. Are you still interested in working on it to get it to GA? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jenin refugee camp

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Abo Yemen -- Abo Yemen (talk) 04:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The article Jenin refugee camp you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jenin refugee camp for comments about the article, and Talk:Jenin refugee camp/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Abo Yemen -- Abo Yemen (talk) 18:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]