User talk:Madz76
{{helpme}}
IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access. |
-Optigan13 (talk) 07:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
A heads up
The reason you get blocked is because you refuse to listen to what other editors say. It would help if you would, you know, follow the rules.
On that note, you shouldn't have multiple accounts. Please read
]Sockpuppet
It's fairly obvious that you're a sockpuppet of
Sources
Hey, a heads-up: fansites are NEVER sources, even if they're translated news articles. Please find the actual news article link and use that instead. Also, I think you're copying and pasting links from other places, because some of your references were cut off &mdash like http://www.site.com/.../page.html. A link should never have "..." in it, so be careful and use the actual link. Thanks in advance. SKS (talk) 04:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:SNSD Kissing You Rhythmer.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SNSD Kissing You Rhythmer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
Page moves.
I undid your Dana move.
When someone is just a singer, use "singer" as a descriptor. So
However, most of the girls in Girls' Generation are not just singers. Many of them are MCs, radio talk show hosts/DJs, actors, models, etc.. So in those cases, "entertainer" is used.
Finally, if someone only uses their first name (or professional name) in "public", that's what the page name should be under.
Hope that clarifies things. Please do not ever assume that just because something works for one page, it should work for all pages (or the reverse, that every page is totally different). That is not true. There are general page policies that cover the entire encyclopedia, but sometimes things are done on a page-by-page basis. SKS (talk) 01:05, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kara (band). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. + ThermoNuclear ☢ 14:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:[email protected]
Thanks for uploading File:[email protected]. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Seohyun@24th GDA.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Seohyun@24th GDA.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:SNSDRunDevilRun.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SNSDRunDevilRun.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
Page creation
Can you please try to create articles with reliable sources instead of just tagging them as unreferenced? Also, please choose one of either {{unreferenced}} or {{refimprove}}? One's for pages with no sources (if you find one, that is, not if you create one) and the other's for pages with few sources. Please see
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 11:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
adding {{fact}} tags
As the editor adding the information, it is your responsibility to find a source. The fact that you keep adding in all this information without a source and simply think adding a {{fact}} tag will do the job is unacceptable. Please make sure that you find a source for the material that you add. Thanks. SKS (talk) 13:35, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Copyright Violations
You're previous account was blocked on terms of your inability to abide by the
{{fact}}
Stop adding content and then adding the {{fact}} tag. It does not work like that. As the person adding the information you must provide the sources. If you do not stop your edits can be seen as
File source problem with File:4minute For Muzik (EP).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:4minute For Muzik (EP).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's
ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. + TNW 17:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. |