User talk:Magicmondays

Speedy deletion nomination of Christine Hogarth

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations

for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boleyn (talk) 20:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Magicmondays, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

info for the Hogarth article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Christine_Hogarth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Megalibrarygirl contact Rosiestep or Megalibrarygirl

A belated welcome and note

Hello, Magicmondays and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for

adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Yngvadottir (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Magicmondays: I see you got a welcome with an invitation to the Teahouse, which is indeed a good place for new editors to ask questions, with a lot of friendly people who are good at explaining our sometimes arcane rules and conventions, including the editing syntax. But nobody gave you a full "welcome" template with links so you can look up the rules and guidelines. Here's one, a bit late, and you're very welcome here.

Regarding Christine Hogarth, I declined the speedy deletion nomination of

here and in fact that whole page. That means in practice that there is a far higher chance of an article on a political candidate being judged acceptable if it contains information about the person's life, rather than only summarizing their résumé; this, plus the way the article was structured close to sources that are about her candidacy, is triggering the judgement by some editors that the article is promotional in intent. I am not Megalibrarygirl or Rosiestep, but I hope my work on the draft and this explanation will be helpful. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

MfD nomination of
Draft:Christine Hogarth

Draft:Christine Hogarth during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 20:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

November 2017

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this supposed to be ironic? Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:12, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Draft:Christine Hogarth
concern

Hi there, I'm

Draft:Christine Hogarth

, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

Userfication

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13

.

Thank you for your attention.

talk) 01:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]