User talk:Mananananananux

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

September 2009

talk) 02:50, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]


talk) 13:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pretty Black

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the

Article Wizard
.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on

guide to writing your first article
.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 75.155.98.203 (talk) 23:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page

external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

AP.9

I have deleted the article for:

  • notability
    ; and
  • unsourced negative claims
    .

Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AP.9

This is an automated message from

AP.9, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.discogs.com/artist/AP9. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy
for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

talk) 17:26, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Repost of
AP.9

discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:05, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Music notability

Please review the criteria for music-related articles. Many of the new pages you are creating fail to meet those criteria and have been or will be deleted. By familiarizing yourself with the guidelines, you'll save yourself a lot of frustration. It also means other editors won't have to continually prod your articles for deletion. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 21:55, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article Wizard. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mob Figaz

Article Wizard
.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tad Lincoln (talk) 21:34, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mob Figaz

I have nominated Mob Figaz, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mob Figaz. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mob Figaz

Sorry for the false accusation of blatant lies. I couldn't find a source to verify the chart positions. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hard 2 Kill (Uncle Murda Mixtape)

The article Hard 2 Kill (Uncle Murda Mixtape) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per
WP:MUSIC
, mixtapes are generally not notable. I can find no indication that this mixtape has received an significant coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kateshortforbob talk 19:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Say Uncle 2 Hard 4 Hip Hop

The article Say Uncle 2 Hard 4 Hip Hop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per
WP:MUSIC
, mixtapes are generally not notable. I can find no indication that this mixtape has received an significant coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kateshortforbob talk 19:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Thizz Nation Vol. 9

The article Thizz Nation Vol. 9 has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yappy2bhere (talk • contribs) 20:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of What's Really Thizzin?

The article What's Really Thizzin? has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yappy2bhere (talk) 20:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of In Thugz We Trust: The Mixtape

The article In Thugz We Trust: The Mixtape has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable mixtape with little or no media coverage of substance. Fails
WP:NALBUM
.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

TheJazzDalek (talk) 23:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Articles for deletion nomination of What's Really Thizzin?

I have nominated What's Really Thizzin?, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What's Really Thizzin?. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jclemens (talk) 04:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Papoose Mixtapes

I have nominated Category:Papoose Mixtapes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for merging into Category:Mixtape albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Beast from the East (album)

I have nominated The Beast from the East (album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beast from the East (album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:25, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The City Of Dope Vol. 1‎

The article The City Of Dope Vol. 1‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yappy2bhere (talk) 03:32, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Lord of War (album)

The article Lord of War (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage found in
WP:NALBUMS
.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Gongshow Talk 06:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mob Figaz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion
. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

message me! 14:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Da'unda'dogg albums

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mananananananux&oldid=1189972825"