User talk:TheJazzDalek

As per consensus at

Your choices concerning what constitutes a reliable source are completely arbitrary. All sources for reliable information on Thomas Fiss have been removed from the external links except for his official MySpace. If you bother to look at his MySpace, you'll see that he's using that site to link to his verified Twitter account (as well as his YouTube channel, his justin.tv channel, the thomasfissmusic.com website, etc.). Why are these sources any less reliable? We are dealing with an entertainer who is constantly involved in new projects. Have you decreed that Wikipedia is not the proper place to provide current information on entertainers? When you delete reliable information, you are not helping Wikipedia achieve its purpose. Wikipedia is supposed to provide information. You and other heavy handed, insensitive editors are impediments to that goal. I wonder how many individuals would be active, contributing authors of Wikipedia articles had they not been mistreated by editors who seem to delight in destroying their work. Do you even make an effort to determine if information is accurate before you delete it? Do you ever make a good faith effort to judge the reliability of a source? You are not doing anyone any favors by preventing us from sharing accurate information. You are not making Wikipedia better. You are just indulging your own ego. It's the intellectual equivalent of bullying.Paparazzo Presents (talk) 04:08, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If he lacks notability, then all the articles about his albums certainly would, correct? Enigma^msg 16:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is Simon back? User: Sonicsyndicate. Rehevkor ✉ 17:41, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you would have to contact him, and he would have to provide you with evidence of his past and following. you shouldn't post untrue comments about him, and he is in the process again of proving you wrong! he knows who's behind this, and he keeps an army close. so beware! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.145.242.159 (talk) 05:11, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are one of the few users still active who helped to cleanup this article. The good debate about what should be mentioned in the article has started up again and was wondering if you would like to comment. Ridernyc (talk) 14:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TheJazzDalek - I have noticed that you have contributed to the List of people who have walked across the United States, and cordially invite you to participate in a new WikiProject Walking that I have proposed. Your support for the project, active or passive, would be appreciated. Bezza84 (talk) 19:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

The article List of tribute albums has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Purpose redundant to Category:Tribute albums and its long list of subcats.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 23:41, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tribute albums is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tribute albums until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 03:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]