User talk:Maragm

Hello,Maragm, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply ] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Since you asked so kindly, here's a belated welcome. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

May 2012–Dec 2014 2015–2016

Hola Maragm, aprecio el interés y me alegra muchísimo tu ayuda en mejorar el artículo. Saludos Aldebaran69 (talk) 22:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Maragm, de nuevo muchas gracias por las molestias de revisar mi traducción y disculpas por el doble trabajo de revisar y corregir, pero a veces se me escapan los errores (estoy tratando de mejorar mi inglés, lo siento!). Saludos Aldebaran69 (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I see you linked "João Afonso Teles de Meneses" to

Gracias por tomarte la molestia de escribirme Maragm, creo que fue mi error el haber escrito el año de nacimiento y dejado la referencia fuera de los paréntesis, pues eso implicaba que el autor respaldaba dichas fechas. De nuevo, disculpas y gracias. Aldebaran69 (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pues eso, ojalá vuelvas con tu saber hacer. Triplecaña (talk) 16:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Someone doesn't like you: see User talk:50.37.117.209. If you really are being paid, can I get in on it? 50.37.117.209 (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Used to having so many fans. Will give you 20% (tax-free) if that's OK with you. --Maragm (talk) 20:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

¡Ostia fruta! Que veo que me han encasquetado como sock-puppet hoy dos veces ya. Poca broma.--Asqueladd (talk) 20:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm a new contributor to Wikipedia who is trying to fix the horrible mess that are the articles on medieval Portuguese history. I don't understand your decision to pass my contributions on the birth of Leonor Teles to a footnote nobody will read. That was the start of the part of the article I was building about her origins and youth. I see almost every artile mention in the body of the article about the birth and childhood. Sincerely I do not get this decision and I think it is quite unfair.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medieval history lover (talk • contribs) 19:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] 

I noticed that you're waiting on approval for access to JSTOR at the Wikipedia Library. JSTOR currently has a waitlist due to lack of available accounts. In the meantime, the

I am seeing an apparent conflict in two of our articles. In Suero Gundemáriz it states that his nephew, Rodrigo Romániz, rebelled against Vermudo III. That Rodrigo Romániz was nephew of Suero Gundemáriz is repeated by Salazar y Acha, "Los descendientes del conde Ero Fernández", p. 72. However, on Bermudo Ovéquiz it says that his father Oveco Bermúdez married Elvira Suárez, daughter of Suero Gundemáriz and Tezguenza Rodríguez, daughter of the rebel count Rodrigo Romániz. That Elvira Suarez was granddaughter of Rodrigo is demonstrated by a charter quoted by Salazar y Acha, p. 72. Still, it seems like somewhere signals have been crossed, because we thus have Suero Gundemáriz marrying his own grandniece. Just on its face, the chronology seems wrong - Rodrigo's son, Munio Rodríguez, was a rebel in 1061, yet this would have his sister married to Suaro Gundemáriz, who was active by 968. Chronological ballparking would seem to place Suaro in the generation before Rodrigo, not the generation after.

I note that for him being grandson of Suero Gundemáriz, you cite Calleja Puerta 2001, which I have not seen. Does he specifically address this relationship with evidence, or has he perhaps jumped to a conclusion? Does Torres Sevilla-Quiñones have anything to say aboout this? (my copy is packed away) I note that Carriedo Tejedo ([1] pp. 111, 116 shows (but does not discuss) 'Guncina', wife of Suero Gundemáriz, as daughter of count Jimeno Díaz by Adosinda, sister of San Rosendo, and the same relationship is shown by Sáez Sánchez ("Notas al episcopologio Mindoniense", tree V/VI) and Mattoso ("As familias condais portucalenses", p 139). It looks like Calleja Puerta has fallen victim to name's-the-same confusion, but before I edit, I wanted to be sure there isn't a new analysis that overrides this consensus. In his "Una familia de la alta edad media: Los Vela", p.42, Salazar y Acha reaffirms that Elvira was granddaughter of Rodrigo. He speculates that the intervening generation is a Suero Rodríguez who appeared in a 1028 charter with his wife Elvira Ramírez. Agricolae (talk) 00:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Digging some more, I find a relationshiip that makes me question the whole reconstruction. Suero Muñoz, brother of count Rodrigo Muñoz of Sagrajas, whom Salazar Acha makes sons of Munio Rodríguez and grandsons of Rodrigo Romániz, married Sancha Vélaz, daughter of Vela Ovéquiz and granddau55ghter of Elvira Suárez, in turn granddaughter of Rodrigo Romániz. This would put 4 generations on one side of the descent vs 2 on the other. It is possible but not very common. Agricolae (talk) 00:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agricolae, I'm in the US now, not in Spain (still with jetlag an a fuzzy mind) and don't have Calleja's book with me. I do have my database in my laptop and have several notes from Calleja on Elvira Suárez, Rodrigo Romániz, etc. which I'll send you via email. Calleja through me off and I have already corrected Elvira's filiation with other sources but am still trying to reconstruct the descendants of R. Romániz. Maragm (talk) 04:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Alfón Gil de Mogollón
• Pedro Gil de Mogollón, Lord of Arroyo del Peche

What is your opinion on these? PROD them as well? Srnec (talk) 04:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@

Pedro Fernández de Ovando, 1st Master of the Order of Santiago (rather than Pedro Fernández de Castro (Grand Master of the Order of Santiago)))[reply

]

Hello, Maragm. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maragm. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm

}} template.

Hello Many times you have undid mmodifications from many members about the actual duke of Gandia and Osuna. You must be aware that you have no right to do that and mention that under Vandalism. There is a conflict in the lineage that has been brought to attention in the soon to be released book about the Borja History and proven that the Osuna line is not accurate. I will be more than happy to send you all the pages. But stop deleting like that when obvioulsy you are not informed about the situation. Best — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoiredeFrance (talk • contribs) 01:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks, perhaps you do. Just added ref, BOE (Official State Gazette) notice by Ministry of Justice on the succession to the title by grand-daughter of former titleholder. Do you have any official sources confirming your assertion? Maragm (talk) 06:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Borja is not a town part of inside Zaragoza, but of the Province of Zaragoza. Because it looks good do not want to say that this is right, the towns of the interior of Spain are not a neighborhood of larger cities, they belong to the comarca, the province, autonomous community and the country, but not to the nearest city, they politically have different government between themselves.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 16:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

it seems right to name like you say the towns within, for example, the municipality of zaragoza, that for each municipality of Spain there are 10 to 17 towns or villages within this, and almost all still have not been created in the wikipedia (see in this wikipedia some towns/municipalities they have shown the towns itself of this municipality. for example, in the article: Arcos de la Frontera, or Cehegín<---in the template-, that actually occurrs there these several towns in almost all municipalities of all communities, but that towns/villages are not named in most municipality articles, or they still not have its article of itself in the English wikipedia yet, but they exists. But the towns that are core of municipalities and they do not belong geographically nor politically to the biggest cities, not, because they belong is to the comarca, province, a.c., but not to a city.

Yes, my intention is to do the same with the articles that have that error--ILoveCaracas (talk) 16:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can be in other wikipedia as they have it, but the truth is that it should not be classified equal to Triana, Seville than to Herrera, Seville. It should not be done and I do not agree.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 18:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Today there are thousands of Spanish villages that have not yet been created and many match the name with neighborhoods of cities.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to do it today, as in all the articles that I have translated you can see the template, I just waited to translate a little more, that I will do it today or tomorrow, just so that the translation will be more noticeable. But then I put it right now.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 19:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But i'm not a user called Vvven, sorry, i'm as it appears in the user's name (IloveCaracas).--ILoveCaracas (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that user, the one that both make articles referring to Spain or Latin America, does not mean that it is Vvven.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 19:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also do articles of France, Morocco, and others, and he apparently did not do them, you speak in English, thanks.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 19:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

then, just ask, you are going to allow me to change the names of some articles that should have a more correct name?--ILoveCaracas (talk) 21:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for live with it with the articles of municipalities (towns that are not part of the cities), I saw it in a comment of yours that you made in the Diannaa talkpage, I appreciate that you accept that or help me with that.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 15:07, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I ask that in order to resolve this issue, you should contest the discussion in a broader subject, that if all the towns that they have included the province in their English titles to which they belong (ie all the towns in question) should be renamed, or remain as they are. you propose. you let me know when you bring it to the contest to start the healthy discussion and resolve the matter, ok?.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 19:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been 3 days, you can take that to request. You do not want me to modify those names but neither do you take them to request, i don't know how to, so ok I'll have to change the wrong names of the towns from now on to what I think is convenient.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 23:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Borja, Province of Zaragoza was undone by another user. It's not what you think is convenient, it's what is correct. Propose the moves in the respective discussion pages, by learning how to make the requests, otherwise you are going to have many more users reverting your changes if they are not correct. That's all I can say. Maragm (talk) 07:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

I think you are right with the Cortes of León article, i revert the move--ILoveCaracas (talk) 14:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you see I first moved the page from Cortes of León to Cortes of León in 1188, that later i reverted (because i didnt see the other articles, but now as you say that exist that others, now i move again as that of my first action. but not only because they are in the wikipedia in Spanish, because that is not enough reason to make decisions in the wikipedia in English.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 14:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Before of my moves of yesterday, it was wrongly named as Cortes of León.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 15:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and removed this part, "Maria did not inherit the insanity that supposedly ran in the royal family and was said to have affected her sister, Joanna of Castile, known as "Joanna the Mad"." I was unsure how to source this particular sentence, hence its removal. --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you removed that important image in the Monastery of Sigena article. which is completely related to the dispute that appears in the article. Two lots of artwork went to 2 museums, one is the Lleida and the other is the MNAC.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ILoveCaracas, because it throws the whole page off, leaving a big empty space in the bottom. Commons has photos, so readers can go there to see them. It's a question of aesthetics. Maragm (talk) 21:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, then i'll fix that adding a gallery bellow the section. I respect the aesthetic, but is a image that can represent everything that is in that museum--ILoveCaracas (talk) 21:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ant thanks for fixing the grammar.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 21:56, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I tried to edit admin noticeboard. I did not able to do that. Please you pastes this there for me

"will some administrator deletes all the articles about persons showing on https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Usernamekiran/creations

All articles are chip. They don't be on this great website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:9506:8203:EC8D:29B9:C486:C5CA (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will. What is that Village Pump?--ILoveCaracas (talk) 07:01, 8 April 2018 (UTC) Since is supported by Historians of Ctalonia, Important politicians of the main parties of Catalonia, members are parlamentaries of Catalan assambley and they often do conferences in the assembly, it could be a valid historical revitionism, atleast could add in the History of Catalonia and Catalonia related articles.--ILoveCaracas (talk) 07:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to believe that William Shakespeare, Christopher Columbus, El Cid, Miguel de Cervantes, etc. were Catalans, fine with me but it is totally debunked and are just nationalistic fringe theories. Maragm (talk) 07:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well these are theories supported by personalities as Oriol Junqueras, Artur Mas and a lot of active Catalan politicians receiving a award of a Catalan important gala. It should be included in a article over the History of Catalonia since much of Catalans believe in that--ILoveCaracas (talk) 07:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is obvious you are not very informed. Ask any serious historian for their opinion. Artur Mas, Oriol Junqueras, etc. are nationalistic politicians, not reputed historians. Maragm (talk) 07:32, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really thank you for helping in the article and I apologize for bothering you before, I could help in whatever you want looking for good sources on the internet--ILoveCaracas (talk) 11:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ILoveCaracas, just let me work on the article a while...not finished yet. Also remember that the format for dates (such as the ones included in the references) is, for example, 1 May 2018 instead of May 1, 2018. Maragm (talk) 12:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will remember that for sure. thank you--ILoveCaracas (talk) 13:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But I ask you not to take it as something somewhat personal, not, that then I'll keep trying to make a link appear in history of catalonia at least, i apologize for that but this is what I want to do with this article because, if not very, very few people are going to see it and I think the subject does not deserve that. again thanks for the disinterested way you do your work in wikipedia--ILoveCaracas (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing a great job, the merit so far is yours. We're going to finish this article very soon--ILoveCaracas (talk) 14:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the talkpage of the article I leave an good link this time--ILoveCaracas (talk) 15:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The truth is that 90% of people live having some kind of political tendency, but I do not want to translate the mine into the article, only participate in completing the best possible this and the other articles i make--ILoveCaracas (talk) 15:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We (the Research Team at Wikimedia Foundation) are building an algorithm that will align Wikipedia article sections across languages. For improving this algorithm we need the help of multilingual Wikipedia editors to provide true statements to the algorithm. You are contacted because based on your Babel template and/or content translation tool usage you know at least two of the following languages: ar (Arabic), fr (French), ja (Japanese), en (English), es (Spanish), ru (Russian).

(Note: by clicking the links in the following paragraph, you will be taken to Google spreadsheet.) If you'd like to help us with translating a subset of the section titles on or before 2018-05-01, please read and follow the instructions. If you see instructions in another language, please scroll down to find your preferred language. If you have questions about this message, you can contact us via Diego. Thank you! :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"We edited at the same time and I'm not sure if my edit is correct. Could you double-check, please? Thanks, Maragm (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)"

Hi Maragm, I haven´t been able to check your edit since that user Filiprino continues to revert my edits but thank you for your intervention. This editor seems to have now a mission, to link SCC with far-right associations, and all his contributions are just about adding comments, many of them POV and links to pro-independence sources, to denigrate the association. Note that this user has been blocked from the Spanish Wikipedia due to misconduct. --BarceloniUK (talk) 20:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:SPA with only editing that article. I have edited many other articles. You are just ignoring information based on nothing (supposed pro-independence). You are reverting and not talking. You are not bringing information which refutes the news about members of SCC being members of the far-right or related with it. Filiprino (talk) 21:10, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

would you mind explaining the reasoning behind your method of citing authors with larger names? 6071m (talk) 19:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

6071m In the case of Braamcamp Freire because he is known by those two last names. In the case of García Pina, she also goes by other names, not Campos. Have the book Uma rainha inesperada where her name appears as Isabel de Pina Baleiras. I see no problem with a larger citation in the botton of the text and prefer to use the full names by which they are known.--Maragm (talk) 11:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Maragm. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pregunta

Hola. Ha surgido una duda en 2019 Spanish general election sobre la traducción al inglés del slogan del PP para las elecciones generales de 2019 ("Valor seguro" en español; el contexto aquí). Se duda entre Safe asset, safe value y trusted values. ¿Qué opinas?--Asqueladd (talk) 23:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:County of Aragon has been nominated for discussion

Category:County of Aragon, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Thank you!

Thank you, Mara, and the same to you! --Technopat (talk) 18:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Velasco Sánchez → ? → Suero Rodríguez

I know that the Galician Velasco Sánchez (active 1153) had a son named Rodrigo Velázquez and that the father of the Galician Suero Rodríguez (died 1206) was named Rodrigo Velázquez. (See sources in articles.) I was wondering if you had information that would indicate that this was one and the same Rodrigo Velázquez? I have not yet found any. Srnec (talk) 19:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]