User talk:MarkSweep

This user may have left Wikipedia. MarkSweep has not edited Wikipedia since August 9, 2009 (5367 days ago). As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I have nominated Exploding chicken, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding chicken. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Habanero-tan (talk) 11:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Spliced speech.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 11:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LC-cwpbh has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:20, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,

(delivered by mabdul 23:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. I would like to create an Association of Pedantic Wikipedians, as you put on your UP. Would you like to be involved, or just simply an "emeritus"? If I don't hear from you, I will just assume the latter. Have a wonderful day. TheOneSean | Talk to me 02:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Rome episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you happen to be around, would you take a look at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Pardon request: Guanaco, MarkSweep, et al? I don't have any plans of becoming an administrator, and you probably won't see this, but there it is. —Guanaco 08:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MarkSweep, this is a courtesy message to inform you that the Arbitration Committee has voted on a motion allowing Guanaco to seek adminship via

Template:Infobox Rome episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Template:Infobox Rome episode has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Transport in China (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation is not required. The primary topic has a hatnote to the Taiwan article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Education in China (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Education in China (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]